mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Efficient RLVR Scheduling via Graph-Structured Online Difficulty Estimation

arXiv 2608.17941 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves the reasoning capabilities of large language models but relies on costly rollout exploration. Assigning the same exploration budget to samples with different difficulty levels is inefficient: easy samples may receive redundant rollouts, whereas difficult but learnable samples may receive too little exploration. Existing adaptive schedulers address this mismatch through curriculum-based sample selection or non-uniform rollout allocation based on estimated sample difficulty. However, obtaining reliable online difficulty estimates remains challenging: dedicated probing adds substantial generation overhead, whereas history-based estimators face a cold start with no initial observations and stale feedback, and typically ignore relations among samples. To address these limitations, we propose a plug-and-play graph-based online difficulty estimator that shares rollout feedback across related samples and continuously updates their difficulty estimates, mitigating cold start and staleness without dedicated probing. Specifically, we first construct a difficulty-aware sample graph based on semantic and reasoning similarities. Based on this graph, we introduce latent difficulty states and use a Potts prior to encourage neighboring samples to share the same state. We then employ a state-level Beta-Binomial model to aggregate the rollout outcomes associated with each state. Finally, we use an online mean-field variational algorithm to continuously update the latent-state assignments and state-level difficulty as new feedback arrives. Our framework can be integrated into sample-selection and rollout-allocation schedulers, enabling difficulty-adaptive exploration without dedicated probing. Experiments across multiple base models, RL schedulers, and benchmarks demonstrate that our framework achieves better performance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 58 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Prune as You Generate: Online Rollout Pruning for Faster and Better RLVR25 Mar
  2. 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards3 Feb
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
  4. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs22 Jan

Other references · 10

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  4. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  5. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  6. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  7. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
  8. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
  9. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 835
  10. 2026Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMscited by 137

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Online Difficulty Filtering for Reasoning Oriented Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026DARE: Difficulty-Adaptive Reinforcement Learning with Co-Evolved Difficulty Estimation
  3. 2025Depth-Breadth Synergy in RLVR: Unlocking LLM Reasoning Gains with Adaptive Exploration
  4. 2026Contextual Rollout Bandits for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
  5. 2026Mechanistically Interpreting the Role of Sample Difficulty in RLVR for LLMs
  6. 2025Staying in the Sweet Spot: Responsive Reasoning Evolution via Capability-Adaptive Hint Scaffolding
  7. 2026Difficulty-Adaptive Tree-Structured Policy Optimization for Expanding Reasoning Coverage in RLVR
  8. 2026Efficient RLVR Training via Weighted Mutual Information Data Selection