mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Continuity-Driven Representation Learning for Industrial Defect Detection

arXiv 2608.17362 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Industrial defect detection differs from natural-image object detection because inspection images are captured under controlled conditions and contain large normal-dominant regions with repetitive structures. Defects therefore appear as localized disruptions of otherwise predictable patterns, while conventional detectors rely mainly on sparse bounding-box supervision, resulting in weakly constrained normal-region representations. We propose a continuity-driven representation regularization framework that exploits normal-dominant regions as dense auxiliary supervision. The framework introduces two detector-agnostic objectives: Multi-Continuity Loss, which combines 1D patch-sequence prediction and 2D masked spatial prediction, and Differencing Loss, which regularizes first-order feature variation and second-order curvature between neighboring patch embeddings. Both objectives are applied with box-derived region weighting to stabilize normal-region representations while preserving defect-related discontinuities. Experiments on two real-world industrial datasets and the public NEU-DET benchmark, using six detector architectures including YOLO-family models, MambaYOLO, and DETR, demonstrate consistent improvements over native detector baselines. In the full-data setting, the proposed regularizers improve average [email protected]:0.95 by up to 3.49 percentage points on Industrial Metal, 5.38 percentage points on MEA, and 5.03 percentage points on NEU-DET. Under limited-data conditions, the gains become more pronounced, with Differencing Loss achieving improvements of up to 21.07 percentage points in [email protected] and 8.23 percentage points in [email protected]:0.95 on NEU-DET using only 25% of the training data. These results suggest that continuity-driven regularization provides an effective prior for improving industrial defect detection, particularly when annotated data are scarce.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 30 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  5. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  6. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
  7. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  8. 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
  9. 2020PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 594
  10. 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
  11. 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 358
  12. 2021Student-Teacher Feature Pyramid Matching for Anomaly Detectioncited by 146
2 more
  1. 2023ReConPatch : Contrastive Patch Representation Learning for Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 30
  2. 2024SPACE: SPAtial-aware Consistency rEgularization for anomaly detection in Industrial applicationscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.