OraclePhys: A Systematic Framework for LLM Fine-Tuning on Structural Mechanics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
What a language model internalizes from fine-tuning is usually diagnosed after the fact. We make it an experimental variable. OraclePhys is a systematic fine-tuning framework with three components: OraclePhys-Bench, an exactly-graded structural-mechanics benchmark whose finite-element oracle scores every answer and counterfactual edit -- no human labels, no LLM judging; OraclePhys-30K, a supervision dataset of seven answer forms over byte-identical structure descriptions; and a controlled training study across the seven forms and three verifier roles. The study yields two findings. First, the label's answer form -- not its bit count -- causally determines what fine-tuning teaches: a ranking objective installs an out-of-distribution forward model where the untrained base sits at the guessing prior, a scalar objective at best a partial one, a boolean nothing detectable; the vector-scalar gulf survives a second physics domain, a second model family, and a paraphrased evaluation surface. Second, written or score-filtered answers install this capability, while advantage-weighted scores (GRPO) raise reward yet leave the model statistically equivalent to its start on held-out physics -- within the recipes and budgets tested -- sufficing only for routing. The trained 8B -- the first LLM on spatial structural response -- reaches the task's data-precision frontier: above a frontier LLM at zero- and 32-shot, at a specialist's level. What the label spells out about the target computation is what fine-tuning teaches; what you train on is what you route.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
24 of 34 references.
References · 24
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 686
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 500
- 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 431
- 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 349
12 more
- 2021Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?cited by 326
- 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 319
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 270
- 2024Many-Shot In-Context Learningcited by 206
- 2024Fine-Tuning Enhances Existing Mechanisms: A Case Study on Entity Trackingcited by 149
- 2025A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforcecited by 145
- 2024Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Modelcited by 113
- 2024Can Language Models Serve as Text-Based World Simulators?cited by 52
- 2023Do Models Really Learn to Follow Instructions? An Empirical Study of Instruction Tuningcited by 49
- 2025What Has a Foundation Model Found? Using Inductive Bias to Probe for World Modelscited by 47
- 2025Tailored Primitive Initialization is the Secret Key to Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2026BeamPERL: Parameter-Efficient RL with Verifiable Rewards Specializes Compact LLMs for Structured Beam Mechanics Reasoningcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Large Language Model Agent as a Mechanical Designer
- 2025A Large Language Model-Empowered Agent for Reliable and Robust Structural Analysis
- 2023MechGPT, a language-based strategy for mechanics and materials modeling that connects knowledge across scales, disciplines and modalities
- 2026StructureClaw: Traceable LLM Agents and an Executable Benchmark for Structural Engineering Workflows
- 2026PolyBridgeBench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs for Physics-Grounded Bridge Design
- 2025FEM-Bench: A Structured Scientific Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating Code-Generating LLMs
- 2026Zero-shot rib design: merging training-free generative prior with topology optimization
- 2025LLMSR@XLLM25: An Empirical Study of LLM for Structural Reasoning