Memory Is Communication: The Frontier Between Remembering and Signaling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A bounded agent may obtain information for a decision from its own past, from peers, or from both sources. Retaining task-relevant history can reduce later communication, while a peer message can supply what memory lacks. Under limits on both resources, how should an agent allocate its information budget? Given a fixed task and decision rule, the memory and message rate pairs attaining a performance threshold form an achievable region under specified rules for using history and peer observations. We call its efficient boundary the remembering--signaling frontier. Across conditions where history permits the same maximum reduction in task loss, we hypothesize that a bounded agent will need less peer communication when it obtains a larger loss reduction from history. In preliminary referential games, target repetition coincided with shorter successful messages, while predictability from a hidden cyclic rule did not shorten them. Experiments varying memory and message rates can estimate the frontier and test this prediction across cooperative tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
6 of 10 references.
References · 6
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
- 2019Learning Efficient Multi-agent Communication: An Information Bottleneck Approachcited by 61
- 2025AgentsNet: Coordination and Collaborative Reasoning in Multi-Agent LLMscited by 31
- 2026Toward a Theory of Hierarchical Memory for Language Agentscited by 5
- 2026From Signals to Structure: How Memory Architecture Drives Language Emergence in LLM Agentscited by 4
- 2025LoopBench: Discovering Emergent Symmetry Breaking Strategies with LLM Swarmscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.