Reconstruction: A Blind Benchmark for Recovering Research Ideas from Pre-Publication Bibliographies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Can a language model recover the true research idea of a published paper when given only that paper's pre-publication bibliography? We introduce Reconstruction, a blind idea-recovery benchmark that withholds the seed paper and all contemporaneous or future literature, and asks models to propose hypotheses that an independent large language model judge matches against the held-out ground-truth idea. A strict anti-leakage protocol-temporal citation cutoff, anonymous reference IDs, and frozen per-paper bibliographies, which prevents prompt-time leakage of the seed idea. Across six scientific domains and 643 evaluated papers, seven frontier models achieve only modest Match rates (approx. 3-15%). We then evaluate a reference-only multi-agent (top 4) pipeline that combines cross-model review with a Swiss tournament over aligned hypothesis slots, without external web search. Cross-model review plus tournament selection raises Match rates to approx. 23-42% across all six domains, which is an observed approx. 2.4x lift over the best single-model baseline. This draft reports the protocol, anti-leakage design, and current results as an arXiv timestamp.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
21 of 31 references.
References · 21
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
- 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 375
- 2024Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researcherscited by 348
- 2024ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Modelscited by 200
- 2024Chain of Ideas: Revolutionizing Research Via Novel Idea Development with LLM Agentscited by 94
- 2024MOOSE-Chem: Large Language Models for Rediscovering Unseen Chemistry Scientific Hypothesescited by 68
- 2025ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decompositioncited by 57
9 more
- 2025How much do language models memorize?cited by 53
- 2025The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research Ideascited by 49
- 2025AI Idea Bench 2025: AI Research Idea Generation Benchmarkcited by 33
- 2026Is this Idea Novel? An Automated Benchmark for Judgment of Research Ideascited by 8
- 2026HindSight: Evaluating LLM-Generated Research Ideas via Future Impactcited by 8
- 2026Measuring the Gap Between Human and LLM Research Ideascited by 7
- 2025Deep Ideation: Designing LLM Agents to Generate Novel Research Ideas on Scientific Concept Networkcited by 5
- 2015On the ranking of a Swiss system chess team tournamentcited by 4
- 2026ResearchStudio-Idea: An Evidence-Grounded Research-Ideation Skill Suite from ML Conference Outcomescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.