mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evolving Executable Pipeline Programs for AutoML with Language Models

arXiv 2608.16416 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated machine learning (AutoML) systems search for pipelines within a space of preprocessing operators, learners, and hyper-parameters specified in advance: they can select and tune known components, but cannot produce structure outside that space. We present LACE, an AutoML framework that instead searches over complete executable pipeline programs: an evolutionary loop maintains a population of scikit-learn-compatible Python classes, and a large language model acts as the variation operator. To our knowledge, LACE is the first to formulate general tabular pipeline AutoML this way, evaluated on standardized OpenML tasks under a leakage-controlled protocol that withholds dataset identity from the generator. Because every candidate is ordinary Python, the returned pipeline and the search that produced it can be inspected and edited directly, rather than only through a framework's model objects. On 68 OpenML classification tasks, LACE with GPT-5.4-mini significantly outperforms auto-sklearn, H2O, and a fixed XGBoost baseline, with no detectable difference against AutoGluon, the strongest search-based system evaluated, while covering the full benchmark. Newer tabular foundation models are more accurate on the subset of tasks they support, but apply a fixed pretrained predictor rather than returning an editable task-specific program. LACE's contribution is therefore not raw accuracy but a search space defined by code: complete coverage, pipelines practitioners can reuse directly, and a component set extended by editing the prompt rather than the framework.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.

Builds on

22 of 45 references.

References · 22

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
  4. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
  5. 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 383
  6. 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 366
  7. 2024ReEvo: Large Language Models as Hyper-Heuristics with Reflective Evolutioncited by 276
  8. 2025AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Codecited by 226
  9. 2024Data Interpreter: An LLM Agent For Data Sciencecited by 225
  10. 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 178
  11. 2023Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineeringcited by 127
  12. 2019FLAML: A Fast and Lightweight AutoML Librarycited by 106
10 more
  1. 2024LLaMEA: A Large Language Model Evolutionary Algorithm for Automatically Generating Metaheuristicscited by 97
  2. 2024AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoMLcited by 87
  3. 2023AutoML-GPT: Automatic Machine Learning with GPTcited by 81
  4. 2016Evaluation of a Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool for Automating Data Sciencecited by 75
  5. 2023MLCopilot: Unleashing the Power of Large Language Models in Solving Machine Learning Taskscited by 66
  6. 2025MLE-STAR: Machine Learning Engineering Agent via Search and Targeted Refinementcited by 58
  7. 2025R&D-Agent: An LLM-Agent Framework Towards Autonomous Data Sciencecited by 41
  8. 2024In-the-loop Hyper-Parameter Optimization for LLM-Based Automated Design of Heuristicscited by 28
  9. 2024LLM Guided Evolution -- The Automation of Models Advancing Modelscited by 20
  10. 2025BLADE: Benchmark suite for LLM-driven Automated Design and Evolution of iterative optimisation heuristicscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.