mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PolyDebate: A Game-Orchestrated Multimodal System for Debate Skills Practice and Evaluation

arXiv 2608.16276 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2026cs.HC cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Debate is a structured form of persuasive communication that trains argument construction, rebuttal, oral delivery, and audience awareness. These skills are valued in education, language learning, and professional communication. Recent AI debate systems and LLM-based judges have advanced argument generation and debate evaluation, but most remain text-centered and rarely support learners through a complete multimodal practice experience. We introduce PolyDebate, a game-orchestrated multimodal system for English debate practice and evaluation. PolyDebate guides learners through staged one-on-one (1v1) debates with an AI opponent, while skill cards, props, and coins make persuasive strategies explicit and turn practice into a game-like interaction. During each session, the system captures learner speech and visual delivery evidence, generates context-aware opponent responses, and produces rubric-informed stage-level and overall feedback. PolyDebate is available as both an immersive Unity 3D game version and a web platform version that share the same workflow and evaluation services. Four studies covering AI opponent quality, evaluation coverage, AI judge feedback, and user perception show that PolyDebate brings debate interaction, gamified scaffolding, multimodal assessment, and structured feedback together in a practical workflow for debate skills practice. The demonstration video is available at https://youtu.be/mHwBG1_8Ebk.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.

Builds on

9 of 13 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020A Lip Sync Expert Is All You Need for Speech to Lip Generation In The Wildcited by 672
  2. 2020ConvoKit: A Toolkit for the Analysis of Conversationscited by 72
  3. 2016Conversational flow in Oxford-style debatescited by 25
  4. 2024Debatrix: Multi-dimensional Debate Judge with Iterative Chronological Analysis Based on LLMcited by 21
  5. 2024Can LLMs Beat Humans in Debating? A Dynamic Multi-agent Framework for Competitive Debatecited by 16
  6. 2025InspireDebate: Multi-Dimensional Subjective-Objective Evaluation-Guided Reasoning and Optimization for Debatingcited by 4
  7. 2025R-Debater: Retrieval-Augmented Debate Generation through Argumentative Memorycited by 4
  8. 2024LLMs as Debate Partners: Utilizing Genetic Algorithms and Adversarial Search for Adaptive Argumentscited by 3
  9. 2025Debatable Intelligence: Benchmarking LLM Judges via Debate Speech Evaluationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.