Walk Before You Run: The Importance of Data Exploration for Data Analysis Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM-based data-analysis tools are increasingly used to help users analyze messy spreadsheets and workbooks, from answering questions over uploaded files to generating code, summaries, and visualizations. These systems are often evaluated by the correctness of their final downstream answers. However, reliable data analysis also depends on an earlier step: understanding what the dataset contains before solving the requested task. For complex workbooks, this Data Exploration step includes identifying the logical tables behind physical sheets, interpreting column semantics, recovering keys and relationships, and detecting quality issues. In current tools and benchmarks, this step is usually left implicit, creating a gap between downstream task performance and the dataset understanding needed for reliable, human-checkable analysis. Our key contribution is to identify this overlooked gap, make Data Exploration a first-class evaluation target, and show through downstream experiments that stronger Data Exploration support improves task performance. To evaluate dataset understanding directly, we introduce two benchmark settings: a real multi-sheet workbook benchmark based on a Vitamin D study dataset, and an extension of DSBench with schema-fixed Data Exploration artifacts. In both settings, systems are evaluated by the quality of a structured artifact capturing tables, columns, semantic roles, relationships, and profiling signals. Our results show that strong LLMs and data-analysis agents still miss important logical structure even when they read spreadsheet content. Furthermore, explicit Data Exploration support often improves downstream correctness, suggesting it should be treated as a first-class, inspectable stage in LLM data-analysis workflows and a natural human-in-the-loop checkpoint where domain experts can review and correct the artifact before downstream analysis proceeds.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
5 of 20 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025DeepAnalyze: Agentic Large Language Models for Autonomous Data Science19 Oct
- 2024InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Tasks10 Jan
Other references · 3
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2019Goals, Process, and Challenges of Exploratory Data Analysis: An Interview Studycited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026ML Engineering Agents - A Data Management Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026ML Engineering Agents - A Data Management Perspective12 Oct 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs
- 2026LongDA: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Long-Document Data Analysis
- 2025AIRepr: An Analyst-Inspector Framework for Evaluating Reproducibility of LLMs in Data Science
- 2025IDA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Interactive Guided Data Analysis
- 2026DA-Studio: An Agentic System for End-to-End Data Analysis
- 2026DV-World: Benchmarking Data Visualization Agents in Real-World Scenarios
- 2025Table Understanding and (Multimodal) LLMs: A Cross-Domain Case Study on Scientific vs. Non-Scientific Data
- 2025Why Do Open-Source LLMs Struggle with Data Analysis? A Systematic Empirical Study