Spatial Attention Noise Masking for Causally Sufficient Interpretability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel causal approach to interpretability for computer vision models that dynamically masks the input image prior to classification. The interpretability of deep learning predictions is critical in high-stakes fields such as medical imaging, security, and autonomous driving. Most interpretability methods are applied passively to already trained models, which typically result in correlational rather than causal explanations. Existing causal interpretability methods are limited to post hoc analysis, weakening the causal claims. Additionally, existing active methods generally lack explanations that explicitly assign responsibility to input features. This work proposes a spatial attention noise masking framework that provides causal explanations about the features sufficient for the prediction. The proposed framework consists of: 1) a UNet-style mask generator, and 2) a Resnet18 encoder and linear classifier that classifies both masked and unmasked versions of an input image. The generated masks are regularized to be sparse and spatially smooth, while masked image embeddings are constrained to remain consistent with embeddings from the corresponding unmasked images. The resulting masks can be interpreted as feature attribution maps that are competitive with related interpretability methods while additionally providing strong causal explanations of model predictions. Quantitative evaluations demonstrate mask faithfulness, near-baseline classification performance across five classification tasks despite substantial masking of image information, and robustness to distribution shifts such as background swapping and natural adversarial examples. Qualitative comparisons further demonstrate mask behavior and competitive interpretability relative to state-of-the-art feature attribution methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.
Builds on
24 of 33 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
12 more
- 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2019An Introduction to Variational Autoencoderscited by 1,000
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
- 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
- 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 259
- 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 101
- 2021Transparency of Deep Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: A Review of Interpretability Methodscited by 83
- 2024Explainable AI for Safe and Trustworthy Autonomous Driving: A Systematic Reviewcited by 53
- 2019Regularizing Black-box Models for Improved Interpretabilitycited by 35
- 2019AttentionRNN: A Structured Spatial Attention Mechanismcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.