mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Metaplasticity as adaptive gradient preconditioning for incremental learning

arXiv 2608.14634 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Biological intelligence naturally prevents catastrophic forgetting through Complementary Learning Systems (CLS) theory, a macroscopic consolidation process driven at the local level by synaptic metaplasticity: the continuous, history-dependent neuromodulation of individual synapses. While artificial neural networks struggle with the stability-plasticity dilemma in non-stationary environments, existing solutions often require task labels or incur massive memory overhead, diverging from biological reality. Re-framing this localized neuromodulation as an optimization-driven process, we introduce SynGAP: Synaptic Geometric Adaptive Preconditioning. SynGAP is a task-free continual learning framework based on adaptive gradient preconditioning. Rather than relying on explicit episodic triggers, SynGAP simulates real-time metaplasticity by maintaining an exponential moving average of the Fisher Information Matrix over a continuous data stream. During the optimization step, these dynamic metaplastic states are translated into a bounded multiplicative mask that preconditions raw gradients, selectively attenuating updates to critical historical parameters. Empirical evaluations demonstrate SynGAP's superior ability to mitigate catastrophic forgetting compared to established baselines. On the Split CIFAR-100 benchmark, SynGAP delivers a 4× increase in accuracy compared to EWC++ and outperforms Experience Replay (ER) by almost 10%, while reducing the forgetting measure by over 10% against both methods. Furthermore, on the CORe50 benchmark, SynGAP achieves about 68%, a 10% improvement over optimizer baselines. By mathematically formalizing continuous biological metaplasticity as stable gradient-based regularization, SynGAP offers a highly robust and memory-efficient solution for adaptive intelligence at the edge.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.

Builds on

16 of 35 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  3. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
  4. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
  5. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
  6. 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
  7. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
  8. 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 742
  9. 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 369
  10. 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 348
  11. 2017CORe50: a New Dataset and Benchmark for Continuous Object Recognitioncited by 289
  12. 2020Understanding the Role of Training Regimes in Continual Learningcited by 180
4 more
  1. 2023Continual Learning with Scaled Gradient Projectioncited by 34
  2. 2021Synaptic metaplasticity in binarized neural networkscited by 29
  3. 2023Two Complementary Perspectives to Continual Learning: Ask Not Only What to Optimize, But Also Howcited by 16
  4. 2025Gradient Descent as Loss Landscape Navigation: a Normative Framework for Deriving Learning Rulescited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.