Wolff-Parkinson-White Detection at 471:1 Class Imbalance: A Leakage-Controlled Study of the Data Bottleneck
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome is a congenital cardiac pre-excitation, clinically important and often missed on the resting 12-lead ECG. Detection is hard: the signature is subtle and the condition rare. We pool two public 12-lead corpora, PTB-XL and Chapman-Shaoxing-Ningbo: 66,951 recordings, 142 of them WPW, a prevalence of 0.21% (about 471:1). Under one pre-specified, leakage-controlled protocol, with a held-out fold contacted exactly once, we compare seven representations of the signal, holding the split and the evaluation fixed. Within these corpora and under a modest compute budget, added diversity and capacity do not raise the ceiling: the most orthogonal detector significantly hurts, a feature-union model matches a two-member vote, a convolutional network reaches the wavelet detector without exceeding it, and self-supervised pretraining fails a pre-specified gate. A leak-free learning curve, re-selecting features at every size, still rises at the full 115 positives for the strongest deployed detector (paired 90-to-100% difference +0.027, 95% CI [0.019, 0.033]), so it is not shown to have saturated. An error analysis tested against independent evidence finds that the missed cases have a narrower QRS, confirmed by an on-machine measurement outside our pipeline after we show the sign of this effect depends on which delineator measures it; that uncertain labels show no enrichment among the misses; and that some apparent false positives are recordings the corpus itself codes as pre-excited, placing part of the label problem in the negative class. We measure the optimism of non-nested selection at 0.11 to 0.13 average precision. The deployed output is a percentile rank in a frozen reference distribution, not a probability. On the held-out fold, on 14 positives, it reaches an average precision of 0.595 and an ROC area of 0.950. It is a screening pre-filter, not a diagnostic tool.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.
Builds on
10 of 30 references.
References · 10
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
- 2019Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural networkcited by 164
- 2020Deep Learning for ECG Analysis: Benchmarks and Insights from PTB-XLcited by 158
- 2020Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scanscited by 158
- 2024ECG-FM: An Open Electrocardiogram Foundation Modelcited by 90
- 2021Self-supervised representation learning from 12-lead ECG datacited by 80
- 2025Opportunistic Screening of Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome using Single-Lead AI-ECG Mobile System: A Real-World Study of over 3.5 million ECG Recordings in Chinacited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.