mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Overcoming Shortcut Learning in Graph Neural Networks through Active Explanation Guidance

arXiv 2608.14121 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) can solve prediction tasks by unintentionally exploiting shortcuts---that is, edges, nodes, and features that correlate with but are not causal for the prediction---which compromise their reliability in out-of-distribution tasks. We introduce XIGL, an architecture-agnostic human-in-the-loop strategy for removing such shortcuts from GNNs. Our key insight is twofold. On the one hand, reliance on shortcuts can be detected by inspecting GNN explanations. On the other hand, once made aware of such shortcuts, sufficiently expert users can provide tailored corrective feedback, which helps deconfound the model. XIGL supports any query strategy; however, since corrective feedback can be expensive to acquire, we develop an active learning strategy for prioritizing explanations that are more likely to display shortcut behavior, lowering annotation and cognitive costs. We showcase the effectiveness of XIGL, including both existing and proposed explanation-based strategies, on several GNN architectures. Our implementation is available online.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.

Builds on

23 of 29 references.

References · 23

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  5. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  6. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  7. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 742
  8. 2020Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 384
  9. 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
  10. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
  11. 2022Interpretable and Generalizable Graph Learning via Stochastic Attention Mechanismcited by 171
  12. 2019Understanding Attention and Generalization in Graph Neural Networkscited by 169
11 more
  1. 2022Global Explainability of GNNs via Logic Combination of Learned Conceptscited by 65
  2. 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 54
  3. 2022Leveraging Explanations in Interactive Machine Learning: An Overviewcited by 53
  4. 2023Identifying Spurious Biases Early in Training through the Lens of Simplicity Biascited by 44
  5. 2022Explaining the Explainers in Graph Neural Networks: a Comparative Studycited by 35
  6. 2022GALAXY: Graph-based Active Learning at the Extremecited by 29
  7. 2024Reconsidering Faithfulness in Regular, Self-Explainable and Domain Invariant GNNscited by 16
  8. 2024Logical Distillation of Graph Neural Networkscited by 7
  9. 2026GNN Explanations that do not Explain and How to find Themcited by 5
  10. 2024xAI-Drop: Don't Use What You Cannot Explaincited by 3
  11. 2026Quantifying Explanation Quality in Graph Neural Networks using Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.