mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Robust data-driven discovery of fractional differential equations via weak formulations and Pareto-based subset selection

arXiv 2608.12879 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2026cs.LG math.DScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fractional partial differential equations describe nonlocal dynamics, but discovering them from noisy data is difficult because fractional differentiation amplifies high-frequency measurement noise and the derivative orders are unknown. We propose Weak-Pareto, which combines an adjoint-consistent weak formulation of fractional terms with Pareto-based subset selection over discrete term types and continuous fractional orders. For linear right-hand-side terms, the adjoint transfers fractional operators from measured fields to smooth test functions, replacing noise-sensitive pointwise differentiation with smoothing integration; for nonlinear terms, the noise-suppression effect is partial yet useful. Coefficients are fitted by ridge regression within a branch-aware differential-evolution search over the orders. The support size is then selected at the validation-error-complexity elbow. We show that the variance of fixed linear right-hand-side weak features vanishes under grid refinement, whereas noise amplification in pointwise fractional features increases with derivative order. Across fractional advection-diffusion, reaction-diffusion, and Burgers benchmarks, Weak-Pareto recovers parsimonious structures from clean and noisy measurements. In controlled advection-diffusion and Burgers comparisons, it retains the correct support at every tested multiplicative-noise level, whereas the unregularised strong-form counterpart largely fails once noise is introduced; this advantage persists under additive Gaussian noise. Ablations show that the weak library drives noise robustness and that continuous-order Pareto search avoids the support-selection failure of a dense fixed dictionary. On the advection-diffusion benchmark, Weak-Pareto yields more consistent operator recovery and substantially lower measured runtime than a contemporary neural baseline.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.

Builds on

8 of 23 references.

References · 8

  1. 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 344
  2. 2020Weak SINDy For Partial Differential Equationscited by 155
  3. 2021Ensemble-SINDy: Robust sparse model discovery in the low-data, high-noise limit, with active learning and controlcited by 137
  4. 2022WeakIdent: Weak formulation for Identifying Differential Equations using Narrow-fit and Trimmingcited by 18
  5. 2023Weak-PDE-LEARN: A Weak Form Based Approach to Discovering PDEs From Noisy, Limited Datacited by 16
  6. 2018Machine Learning of Space-Fractional Differential Equationscited by 12
  7. 2023Adaptive Uncertainty-Guided Model Selection for Data-Driven PDE Discoverycited by 6
  8. 2024A Data-Driven Framework for Discovering Fractional Differential Equations in Complex Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.