mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Universality of e-detectors for ARL control

arXiv 2608.12660 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2026math.ST cs.IT eess.SPcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An e-detector for a pre-change class mathcal P is a nonnegative process M such that mathbb EP[Mτ] ≤ mathbb EP[τ] for all stopping times τ and all P ∈ mathcal P. Thresholding e-detectors controls the average run length (ARL): declaring a change at the first time Tb when M crosses b ensures that infP ∈ mathcal Pmathbb EP[T] ≥ b. But e-detectors do substantially more than control the ARL; they also satisfy a optional-horizon inequality: [ P(Tb≤σ)≤ mathbb EP[σ]/b ] for every data-dependent stopping time (monitoring horizon) (σ) and P∈ mathcal P. In particular, every e-detector-based procedure obeys P(T≤ t)≤ t/b at each fixed t, thus avoiding early false alarms. Remarkably, the converse also holds: every stopping time T that satisfies the optional-horizon inequality must in fact arise from thresholding an e-detector. We also derive a universal representation of stopping times that satisfy (only) ARL control. These are represented by weak e-detectors, that only require mathbb EP[Mτ] ≤ mathbb EP[τ] to hold at all threshold stopping times Tb. Appendices present universal representations for other (less common) change detection metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.