RelShap: Relationally Consistent Shapley Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning pipelines commonly flatten relational data into single-table representations, discarding structural constraints. Widely used Shapley value-based feature attributions then rely on feature independence, evaluating the model on combinations that could never arise in the underlying data, producing misleading explanations. We propose RelShap, a framework that incorporates relational constraints and data provenance into Shapley value computation, restricting both background data and coalition evaluation to relationally valid configurations. The framework is estimator-agnostic and composes with Kernel SHAP, Monte Carlo, and Leverage SHAP without altering their sampling or weighting properties. Functional dependencies further induce equivalence classes over feature coalitions, which RelShap exploits to reduce runtime without changing Shapley values; we provide a combinatorial characterization of the expected speedup. Experiments across multiple datasets, models, and estimators show that RelShap produces explanations that are more faithful to the data-generating process, correctly identifying the dominant feature in controlled settings where existing methods, including Conditional SHAP and ManifoldShap, do not. Our code is available at: https://github.com/duneag2/relshap.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.
Builds on
22 of 46 references.
References · 22
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
- 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 223
- 2022On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 186
- 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 178
- 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 167
- 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 154
- 2020True to the Model or True to the Data?cited by 126
- 2020Causal Shapley Values: Exploiting Causal Knowledge to Explain Individual Predictions of Complex Modelscited by 107
- 2020Shapley explainability on the data manifoldcited by 88
10 more
- 2019The Shapley Value of Tuples in Query Answeringcited by 23
- 2024Provably Accurate Shapley Value Estimation via Leverage Score Samplingcited by 23
- 2025Relational Deep Learning: Challenges, Foundations and Next-Generation Architecturescited by 23
- 2025Regression-adjusted Monte Carlo Estimators for Shapley Values and Probabilistic Valuescited by 19
- 2021Computing the Shapley Value of Facts in Query Answeringcited by 11
- 2024The Shapley Value in Database Managementcited by 11
- 2022Fool SHAP with Stealthily Biased Samplingcited by 6
- 2026Explanation Multiplicity in SHAP: Characterization and Assessmentcited by 5
- 2026An Odd Estimator for Shapley Valuescited by 5
- 2025Relation-Stratified Sampling for Shapley Values Estimation in Relational Databasescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.