mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fool SHAP with Stealthily Biased Sampling

arXiv 2205.15419 ↗First posted 30 May 2022cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

SHAP explanations aim at identifying which features contribute the most to the difference in model prediction at a specific input versus a background distribution. Recent studies have shown that they can be manipulated by malicious adversaries to produce arbitrary desired explanations. However, existing attacks focus solely on altering the black-box model itself. In this paper, we propose a complementary family of attacks that leave the model intact and manipulate SHAP explanations using stealthily biased sampling of the data points used to approximate expectations w.r.t the background distribution. In the context of fairness audit, we show that our attack can reduce the importance of a sensitive feature when explaining the difference in outcomes between groups while remaining undetected. More precisely, experiments performed on real-world datasets showed that our attack could yield up to a 90% relative decrease in amplitude of the sensitive feature attribution. These results highlight the manipulability of SHAP explanations and encourage auditors to treat them with skepticism.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2022.

Builds on

12 of 25 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  4. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  5. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  6. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  7. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
  8. 2020Shapley explainability on the data manifoldcited by 88
  9. 2019Fairwashing: the risk of rationalizationcited by 81
  10. 2020Explainability for fair machine learningcited by 33
  11. 2021Fooling Partial Dependence via Data Poisoningcited by 16
  12. 2019Faking Fairness via Stealthily Biased Samplingcited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

6 papers.