mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Every Token Counts: Exact Likert-Scale Distributions for Measuring LLM Attitudes and Biases

arXiv 2608.10503 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, accurately evaluating their latent values and biases is critical. The NLP community typically evaluates models using large, unstructured benchmarks. While effective for general capabilities, these datasets fundamentally conflate causal mechanisms: even when an aggregate bias is detected, unstructured evaluations cannot disentangle whether it stems from baseline traits, contextual confounders, or complex interactions. To address this, we introduce an analytically exact framework for the controlled behavioral evaluation of LLMs. We bridge human psychometrics with LLM mechanics by resolving gaps in design, measurement, and analysis. First, we replace unstructured prompting with fully crossed factorial experiments to systematically isolate causal main and interaction effects. Second, we eliminate Monte Carlo text sampling noise by operating directly on exact, token-level Probability Mass Functions (PMFs). Third, we derive a multivariate ordinal consensus metric and a distributional ANOVA to process these PMFs analytically. We validate our framework with a case study on consumer ethnocentrism across five LLMs, demonstrating how our approach isolates systemic country-of-origin biases that aggregate benchmarks otherwise obscure.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

18 of 45 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  3. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
  4. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
  5. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 773
  6. 2023Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Modelscited by 437
  7. 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traitscited by 234
  8. 2024WorldValuesBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark Dataset for Multi-Cultural Value Awareness of Language Modelscited by 60
  9. 2023You don't need a personality test to know these models are unreliable: Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Models on Psychometric Instrumentscited by 48
  10. 2025Break the Checkbox: Challenging Closed-Style Evaluations of Cultural Alignment in LLMscited by 26
  11. 2025On The Origin of Cultural Biases in Language Models: From Pre-training Data to Linguistic Phenomenacited by 22
  12. 2023GD-COMET: A Geo-Diverse Commonsense Inference Modelcited by 13
6 more
  1. 2025Value Drifts: Tracing Value Alignment During LLM Post-Trainingcited by 10
  2. 2025Do Psychometric Tests Work for Large Language Models? Evaluation of Tests on Sexism, Racism, and Moralitycited by 9
  3. 2025Do You Know About My Nation? Investigating Multilingual Language Models' Cultural Literacy Through Factual Knowledgecited by 8
  4. 2025Is It Bad to Work All the Time? Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Social Norm Biases in GPT-4cited by 5
  5. 2025Tailored Emotional LLM-Supporter: Enhancing Cultural Sensitivitycited by 5
  6. 2025Artificial Impressions: Evaluating Large Language Model Behavior Through the Lens of Trait Impressionscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.