mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A matched-integrator evaluation of Hamiltonian neural networks on pendulum and Kepler dynamics

arXiv 2608.10235 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hamiltonian Neural Networks (HNNs) parameterize conservative dynamics through a learned scalar Hamiltonian, providing an architectural prior that is absent from generic vector-field neural networks. We evaluate this prior under a controlled protocol in which an HNN and a parameter-matched feedforward baseline are trained on the same RK4-generated trajectories, use the same central-difference derivative targets and optimization settings, and are integrated at inference with the same RK4 scheme. Results are reported over five independent training seeds. On the nonlinear pendulum, the HNN reduces mean energy drift by 42-fold and mean trajectory MSE by 15.8-fold at T = 100, approximately 16 pendulum periods. Its energy drift also remains bounded and exhibits substantially lower seed-to-seed variability than the standard-network baseline. An energy-stratified analysis shows that the difference becomes more pronounced as trajectories explore more nonlinear regions of phase space. As an additional diagnostic, we examine an explicit St"ormer--Verlet-style rollout of the learned HNN. Because the learned Hamiltonian is not constrained to the separable form H(q,p) = T(p) + V(q), the standard symplecticity guarantee of velocity Verlet does not directly apply. We further apply the same matched-integrator protocol to the three-dimensional Kepler two-body problem. The HNN again exhibits lower trajectory, energy, and angular-momentum drift than the parameter-matched baseline. These experiments provide a controlled study of how Hamiltonian parameterization affects long-horizon prediction and physical consistency across two conservative dynamical systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

Builds on

6 of 11 references.

References · 6

  1. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  2. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
  3. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 712
  4. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 398
  5. 2019Symplectic ODE-Net: Learning Hamiltonian Dynamics with Controlcited by 184
  6. 2019Hamiltonian Generative Networkscited by 137

Built on by

Not cited yet.