mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Post-Hoc Sparse Coding of Latent Communication Between Vision-Language Model Agents

arXiv 2608.10198 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Latent-space communication allows heterogeneous vision-language model agents to exchange continuous representations without serializing visual and reasoning states into text. Vision Wormhole realizes this approach by translating visual features into a universal latent representation that can be consumed by another model, but every message is transported as a dense tensor of the same size regardless of its content. A fixed-capacity dense tensor therefore need not have a fixed effective information density: some messages may use only a small fraction of the available representational degrees of freedom. This observation suggests that the communication channel may be substantially compressible. We study its redundancy by fitting a post-hoc sparse autoencoder to frozen Vision Wormhole activations and measuring reconstruction, downstream utility, feature reuse, and token-level interventions across nine reasoning benchmarks. Relative to the original float32 transport, a uint16-index/float16-value sparse payload with k=4 active coefficients per token reduces the transmitted bytes by 128x. In a single-run evaluation, the seven-task non-AIME mean accuracy changes from 49.85% to 49.77%. The fitted 4096-element dictionary uses only 50 features, and task-level active sets have a mean pairwise Jaccard similarity of 0.906. These measurements establish strong post-hoc compressibility relative to the original transport, but do not yet isolate the incremental contribution of sparse coding from position selection, reduced precision, low-rank structure, or SAE optimization effects. The results motivate matched-payload comparisons and communication mechanisms whose payload adapts to the information used by each message.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 17 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  3. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
  4. 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,386
  5. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 930
  6. 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 906
  7. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 864
  8. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 575
  9. 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 478
  10. 2022Not All Patches are What You Need: Expediting Vision Transformers via Token Reorganizationscited by 363
  11. 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 263
  12. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
2 more
  1. 2026The Vision Wormhole: Latent-Space Communication in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systemscited by 9
  2. 2026Latent Communication Between Language Model Agents: Channels, Alignment, and the Limits of Textcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spaces
  2. 2026Scaling Video Understanding via Compact Latent Multi-Agent Collaboration
  3. 2026Efficient Inference for Large Vision-Language Models: Bottlenecks, Techniques, and Prospects
  4. 2026SEM: Sparse Embedding Modulation for Post-Hoc Debiasing of Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Sparse Visual Thought Circuits in Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026Self-Consistent Latent Reasoning: Long Latent Sequence Reasoning for Vision-Language Model
  7. 2026From Patching to Pruning Visual Computation in Vision Language Models
  8. 2026Conceptualizing Embeddings: Sparse Disentanglement for Vision-Language Models