Energy and Performance Benchmarking of Deep Learning Models for Breast Cancer Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in machine learning have greatly improved breast cancer detection, enabling more accurate and timely diagnosis. Deep learning (DL) models show strong potential for medical image analysis; however, as their architectural complexity increases, their environmental impacts are becoming a growing concern. In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of seven DL models for breast cancer detection on two medical datasets: Breast Ultrasound and BreakHis 400X. The evaluated architectures range from Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transformers to hybrid models. In addition to performance metrics, we assess CO2 emissions during both training and inference. Our results show that EfficientNet and ResNet consistently deliver strong performance, although with higher CO2 emissions. The selected transformers, such as DeiT-Tiny, perform competitively on both datasets, whereas DenseNet121 achieves lower accuracy. On the Breast Ultrasound Dataset, DeiT provides the most favourable balance between accuracy and energy consumption, whereas on the BreakHis dataset, the ViT and Swin models achieve the best results. Overall, our findings indicate that no single architecture category from the evaluated ones consistently dominates across the two selected datasets. Our results highlight the importance of jointly considering performance, emissions, and dataset characteristics when selecting models for medical applications.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.
Builds on
6 of 14 references.
References · 6
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
- 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
- 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,101
- 2019Green AIcited by 627
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
- 2018A Survey on Deep Transfer Learningcited by 419
Built on by
Not cited yet.