mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Langevin dynamics along the zero set of real-analytic potentials

arXiv 2608.09840 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2026math.PR math.ST stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the Langevin diffusion dXt = - β nabla V(Xt) dt + √2 dBt for a general nonnegative real-analytic potential V and a large parameter β. In the large-β limit the process is confined to the zero set of V, assuming that it starts there. We derive a candidate limiting evolution on the zero set. To do so, the zero set is partitioned into strata according to a measure of local codimension known as the local learning coefficient and its multiplicity. It is then shown that the Dirichlet form associated with X converges in a certain sense to a hierarchy of Dirichlet forms corresponding to a stochastic evolution on the strata. This evolution is strongly biased toward higher-dimensional, or "more singular", strata. This result is motivated by a question from Watanabe's singular learning theory regarding the learning dynamics of overparameterized statistical models and the generalization puzzle in deep learning. The result suggests a mechanism for the observation that stochastic gradient methods tend to be biased toward singular solutions that generalize well.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 54 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 298
  2. 2015Stochastic modified equations and adaptive stochastic gradient algorithmscited by 141
  3. 2019Implicit regularization for deep neural networks driven by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck like processcited by 123
  4. 2021Label Noise SGD Provably Prefers Flat Global Minimizerscited by 121
  5. 2021Implicit Bias of SGD for Diagonal Linear Networks: a Provable Benefit of Stochasticitycited by 107
  6. 2021What Happens after SGD Reaches Zero Loss? --A Mathematical Frameworkcited by 106
  7. 2020Shape Matters: Understanding the Implicit Bias of the Noise Covariancecited by 88
  8. 2023The Local Learning Coefficient: A Singularity-Aware Complexity Measurecited by 50
  9. 2020Deep Learning is Singular, and That's Goodcited by 49
  10. 2024Loss Landscape Degeneracy and Stagewise Development in Transformerscited by 39
  11. 2024Differentiation and Specialization of Attention Heads via the Refined Local Learning Coefficientcited by 39
  12. 2022Label noise (stochastic) gradient descent implicitly solves the Lasso for quadratic parametrisationcited by 29
2 more
  1. 2023Dynamical versus Bayesian Phase Transitions in a Toy Model of Superpositioncited by 28
  2. 2024Estimating the Local Learning Coefficient at Scalecited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.