mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Why Post-Norm Transformers Collapse: Attention Amplification and Gradient Repair Failure

arXiv 2608.09417 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep decoder-only Transformers often replace the original Post-Norm architecture with Pre-Norm variants because Post-Norm training is highly sensitive to warmup and learning rate under conventional initialization schemes. Although prior work has identified rank collapse and gradient vanishing as related symptoms, it remains poorly understood how causal attention creates high-similarity representations and why training dynamics fail to repair them. We give a two-stage analysis of Post-Norm rank collapse using token similarity as a scalar state variable. First, at initialization, causal attention acts approximately as a prefix-averaging operator that increases token similarity across depth, while the SwiGLU branch contributes only a smaller damping effect. Second, once training enters a high-similarity regime, growth of pre-normalization residual norms makes the RMSNorm backward factor contractive; under mild conditions, gradients to earlier layers decay geometrically. As a complementary result, we characterize the properties of a collapsed network: its best predictor is frequency distribution with relatively high loss floor, and gradients in collapsed layers vanish at frequency distribution. Experiments on 48-layer decoder-only Transformers trained on C4 dataset match the predicted initialization-time similarity growth and collapse-time gradient contraction, and show that collapsed runs stay near the predicted frequency loss. Together, these results distinguish the forward similarity amplification and backward repair incapacity in Post-Norm collapse, while also characterizing the behavior of collapsed networks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

Builds on

42 of 48 references.

References · 42

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  6. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  7. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  8. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  9. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  10. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  11. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  12. 2020GLU Variants Improve Transformercited by 1,804
30 more
  1. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
  2. 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 922
  3. 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 764
  4. 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 622
  5. 2021Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depthcited by 419
  6. 2018Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networkscited by 317
  7. 2019Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translationcited by 309
  8. 2020ReZero is All You Need: Fast Convergence at Large Depthcited by 264
  9. 2016Exponential expressivity in deep neural networks through transient chaoscited by 261
  10. 2019Representation Degeneration Problem in Training Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 255
  11. 2020Understanding the Difficulty of Training Transformerscited by 210
  12. 2016Deep Information Propagationcited by 195
  13. 2022DeepNet: Scaling Transformers to 1,000 Layerscited by 178
  14. 2018Dynamical Isometry and a Mean Field Theory of CNNs: How to Train 10,000-Layer Vanilla Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 176
  15. 2023Stabilizing Transformer Training by Preventing Attention Entropy Collapsecited by 161
  16. 2019Transformers without Tears: Improving the Normalization of Self-Attentioncited by 153
  17. 2022Signal Propagation in Transformers: Theoretical Perspectives and the Role of Rank Collapsecited by 141
  18. 2017Resurrecting the sigmoid in deep learning through dynamical isometry: theory and practicecited by 132
  19. 2021NormFormer: Improved Transformer Pretraining with Extra Normalizationcited by 83
  20. 2020RealFormer: Transformer Likes Residual Attentioncited by 62
  21. 2019Improving Deep Transformer with Depth-Scaled Initialization and Merged Attentioncited by 59
  22. 2024On the Role of Attention Masks and LayerNorm in Transformerscited by 48
  23. 2018Dynamical Isometry and a Mean Field Theory of RNNs: Gating Enables Signal Propagation in Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 45
  24. 2023ResiDual: Transformer with Dual Residual Connectionscited by 31
  25. 2024Transformers Get Stable: An End-to-End Signal Propagation Theory for Language Modelscited by 18
  26. 2022B2T Connection: Serving Stability and Performance in Deep Transformerscited by 16
  27. 2022Addressing Token Uniformity in Transformers via Singular Value Transformationcited by 14
  28. 2025From Condensation to Rank Collapse: A Two-Stage Analysis of Transformer Training Dynamicscited by 10
  29. 2026Post-LayerNorm Is Back: Stable, ExpressivE, and Deepcited by 7
  30. 2026Exact Attention Sensitivity and the Geometry of Transformer Stabilitycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.