mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ChronoState: Hidden Elapsed-Time Conditioning for Temporal-State Action Selection in Frozen-Backbone Language Models

arXiv 2608.09124 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal decisions in language-model systems often depend on both symbolic task state and elapsed wall-clock time, such as cache expiration, job completion, quota resets, deadlines, or stale sessions. We study whether elapsed time can be supplied as a non-token, system-side scalar and composed with visible symbolic state by a frozen-backbone language model. We introduce ChronoState, a compositional temporal-state benchmark in which symbolic state appears in the prompt, elapsed seconds tau are supplied through a hidden chronometric-injection channel, and the model selects a forced-choice temporal action. Here, "hidden" means hidden from the user-visible token sequence, not from model computation. Using Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct as a frozen bf16 backbone with a 31-dimensional sinusoidal-plus-log time encoding, gated FiLM residual modulation, and a rank-8 LoRA action surface, hidden-time CI reaches 0.9305 +/- 0.0134 accuracy and 0.9410 +/- 0.0103 balanced accuracy. No-time and shuffled-time controls fall to 0.5511 +/- 0.0042 and 0.3323 +/- 0.0097, respectively, with high shuffled-time wrong-state consistency supporting causal dependence on the injected scalar within the trained distribution. Generalization remains strong for held-out templates, durations, and multi-constraint compositions, but held-out quota-family transfer is weak at 0.5065 +/- 0.0559, while a fair prompt+LoRA timestamp baseline reaches 0.9893 +/- 0.0052. Thus, ChronoState supports a narrow conclusion: hidden elapsed time can be composed with symbolic task state under direct supervision, but does not establish autonomous time tracking, broad unseen-family abstraction, or superiority over prompt-injected timestamps.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 20 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
  4. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  5. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  6. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  7. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  8. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
  9. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
  10. 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
  11. 2021Time-Aware Language Models as Temporal Knowledge Basescited by 290
  12. 2019Time2Vec: Learning a Vector Representation of Timecited by 208
5 more
  1. 2025Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM Agentscited by 145
  2. 2024Test of Time: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Temporal Reasoningcited by 83
  3. 2023TRAM: Benchmarking Temporal Reasoning for Large Language Modelscited by 39
  4. 2022Time-aware Prompting for Text Generationcited by 10
  5. 2025Your LLM Agents are Temporally Blind: The Misalignment Between Tool Use Decisions and Human Time Perceptioncited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.