mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SoftMCC: An MCC-Brier Calibration Bridge for Threshold-Free Model Selection under Class Imbalance

arXiv 2608.08984 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model selection for imbalanced binary classification often uses the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), but thresholding makes validation rankings threshold-dependent. SoftMCC is a post-training MCC validation framework on established probability-valued confusion counts, coupling an MCC-specific calibrated identity with a tie-aware, shared-pool selection protocol. Its core score is a covariance-normalized probability-label association, reduces exactly to MCC for hard predictions, and is Pearson-bounded. Under perfect population calibration it equals the Brier skill score with identical candidate ordering; outside that regime the gap does not identify calibration error. Across 18 settings with 12 duplicate-safe grouped repeats, SoftMCC attains the best stability mean rank (2.31) and highest mean tie-corrected Kendall's W (0.659), with a significant Friedman test (p=0.007); Nemenyi analysis separates it from AUPRC and [email protected], while 14-source-family sensitivity retains only the latter. Selected-model utility shows no advantage. Three of six prespecified comparisons have negative mean test-MCC differences, only F1@best survives Holm correction (p=0.014), and the dataset-level test is not significant (p=0.117). Label permutation lowers mean W to 0.092; temperature scaling shifts SoftMCC rankings (mean Spearman 0.851) whereas rank-based and threshold-optimized metrics remain invariant. SoftMCC is a calibration-sensitive MCC-family selector with bounded stability and utility evidence.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

Builds on

11 of 71 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 620
  3. 2016Imbalanced-learn: A Python Toolbox to Tackle the Curse of Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learningcited by 195
  4. 2017PMLB: A Large Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 140
  5. 2018Tunability: Importance of Hyperparameters of Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 99
  6. 2016Time for a change: a tutorial for comparing multiple classifiers through Bayesian analysiscited by 93
  7. 2021Classifier Calibration: A survey on how to assess and improve predicted class probabilitiescited by 73
  8. 2020Appropriateness of Performance Indices for Imbalanced Data Classification: An Analysiscited by 7
  9. 2020Matthews Correlation Coefficient Loss for Deep Convolutional Networks: Application to Skin Lesion Segmentationcited by 5
  10. 2020Bridging the Gap: Unifying the Training and Evaluation of Neural Network Binary Classifierscited by 4
  11. 2024AnyLoss: Transforming Classification Metrics into Loss Functionscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.