Semi-Dense Matching Uncertainty Is Not Just Local Confidence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable semi-dense matching is essential for modern geometric vision systems. Designed under a coarse-to-fine paradigm, it achieves an optimal balance between performance and computational cost. However, existing methods often struggle to provide well-quantified uncertainties, where catastrophic coarse-assignment failures are ignored, leading to truncated error distributions and severely misjudged geometric estimations. In this paper, we propose a lightweight, post-hoc overall uncertainty estimation framework that introduces a two-component calibrated Laplace mixture model with only 9 learnable parameters. The objective is to explicitly capture both the sharp local refinement noise and the broader tail of coarse-assignment failures. We introduce the Coarse-success posterior Refit (CoRe) method, a geometric refitting module that utilizes the posterior probability of coarse-assignment success as soft correspondence weights. Extensive experiments show that our method consistently improves downstream geometric accuracy across various pretrained-only matchers and robust estimators with minimal computational overhead. Our code is available at https://github.com/khoavpt/Probabilistic-matching.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2026.
Builds on
30 of 46 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2015ORB-SLAM: a Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM Systemcited by 983
- 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 974
- 2015NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognitioncited by 935
- 2016ORB-SLAM2: an Open-Source SLAM System for Monocular, Stereo and RGB-D Camerascited by 801
- 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 731
- 2018From Coarse to Fine: Robust Hierarchical Localization at Large Scalecited by 556
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
- 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 261
- 2022DKM: Dense Kernelized Feature Matching for Geometry Estimationcited by 174
18 more
- 2022ASpanFormer: Detector-Free Image Matching with Adaptive Span Transformercited by 170
- 2019MAGSAC++, a fast, reliable and accurate robust estimatorcited by 160
- 2017Graph-Cut RANSACcited by 133
- 2022QuadTree Attention for Vision Transformerscited by 129
- 2022MatchFormer: Interleaving Attention in Transformers for Feature Matchingcited by 126
- 2018MAGSAC: marginalizing sample consensuscited by 122
- 2024Efficient LoFTR: Semi-Dense Local Feature Matching with Sparse-Like Speedcited by 119
- 2021Learning Accurate Dense Correspondences and When to Trust Themcited by 113
- 2024XFeat: Accelerated Features for Lightweight Image Matchingcited by 113
- 2019Distribution Calibration for Regressioncited by 88
- 2021PDC-Net+: Enhanced Probabilistic Dense Correspondence Networkcited by 80
- 2024GIM: Learning Generalizable Image Matcher From Internet Videoscited by 72
- 2025RoMa v2: Harder Better Faster Denser Feature Matchingcited by 44
- 2022TopicFM: Robust and Interpretable Topic-Assisted Feature Matchingcited by 32
- 2025CoMatch: Dynamic Covisibility-Aware Transformer for Bilateral Subpixel-Level Semi-Dense Image Matchingcited by 12
- 2025EDM: Efficient Deep Feature Matchingcited by 7
- 2025RANSAC Scoring Functions: Analysis and Reality Checkcited by 2
- 2026SURE: Semi-dense Uncertainty-REfined Feature Matchingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.