mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agent-MD: Selective LLM Intervention with Event-Driven Escalation for Stateful GCMC--MD Campaigns

arXiv 2608.07637 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.AI cond-mat.mtrl-scicited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Long-running molecular simulation campaigns require repeated continuation from saved states, provenance-aware progression, adaptive assessment, and occasional interpretation of workflow conditions that cannot be resolved safely by fixed rules. Here, we present Agent-MD, a framework that places large language model (LLM) reasoning selectively at campaign construction and event-triggered review, while routine simulation, analysis, continuation, archiving, and state progression are handled by a persistent rule-based campaign agent using approved policies and explicit state records. Agent-MD was demonstrated in a grand canonical Monte Carlo-molecular dynamics (GCMC-MD) water-vapor desorption campaign comprising five montmorillonite systems and three sequential relative-humidity states (RH = 0.9-0.3-0.1). Across 15 system-RH states, the workflow completed 120 segmented simulation cycles with state-specific sampling lengths and provenance-aware restart inheritance. Routine production required no live reasoning-agent invocation, while one state reached a review boundary; two preserved incidents were subsequently evaluated through blinded reasoning-agent replay, which identified the underlying workflow problems and recommended appropriate follow-up actions. The simulations also revealed distinct composition-dependent low-RH responses, with Ca-bearing montmorillonite retaining more interlayer water and maintaining a larger basal spacing than the Na- and K-bearing systems, while the highest-charge Na system retained more residual water under dry conditions. These results demonstrate that long-running scientific workflows need not place every operation inside an LLM reasoning loop: selective reasoning can instead be combined with deterministic execution, structured evidence, and validated control handoffs to provide reproducible and auditable agent-assisted molecular simulation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

5 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026SimMOF: AI agent for Automated MOF Simulations31 Mar

Other references · 4

  1. 2020AiiDA 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenancecited by 22
  2. 2025MDCrow: Automating Molecular Dynamics Workflows with Large Language Modelscited by 22
  3. 2015AiiDA: Automated Interactive Infrastructure and Database for Computational Sciencecited by 20
  4. 2026Multi-Agent Orchestration for High-Throughput Materials Screening on a Leadership-Class Systemcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MDAgent2: Large Language Model for Code Generation and Knowledge Q&A in Molecular Dynamics
  2. 2026MDForge: Agentic Molecular Dynamics Pipeline Design under Sparse Simulator Feedback
  3. 2026El Agente Gr'afico: A Semantic Execution Runtime for Scientific Agents
  4. 2025DREAMS: Density Functional Theory Based Research Engine for Agentic Materials Simulation
  5. 2024A Review of Large Language Models and Autonomous Agents in Chemistry
  6. 2026Molecular LLM Agents: From Architectural Design to Scientific Autonomy
  7. 2026PHREEQC-MCQ-200: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Tool-Augmented Scientific Simulator Agents
  8. 2025VASP Agent: An Agentic Framework for Autonomous First-principles Calculations