mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Authoring and Management of Transparent Research Integrity Assessments of Randomised Clinical Trial Publications Using LLM-assisted Tools and Provenance Knowledge Graphs

arXiv 2608.07202 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Systematic reviews of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) are routinely used as evidence for clinical care guidelines. Such evidence has to meet high research integrity standards to prevent low quality or false research outputs influencing the clinical care. However, assessing research integrity of published RCTs is a complex process requiring manual effort, and potentially resulting in diverse opinions of the human assessors. This paper describes INSPECT-AI, an LLM-based interactive tool that assists human reviewers with research integrity assessments of published RCTs based on the community approved INSPECT-SR framework, and the Research Integrity Provenance and Evidence ontology (RIPE-O) for documenting the provenance of the assessment process. In addition, we present the Research Integrity Provenance and Evidence knowledge graph (RIPE-KG), an initial set of 140 expert research integrity assessments of 95 RCT publications generated by INSPECT-AI and described using RIPE-O.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

2 of 33 references.

References · 2

  1. 2023The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platformcited by 114
  2. 2023SemOpenAlex: The Scientific Landscape in 26 Billion RDF Triplescited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.