When One Modality Is Not Enough: Multimodal Sex and Life-Stage Classification of Red Deer from Aerial RGB-Thermal Video
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Aerial drone surveys increasingly support wildlife population estimation, yet a useful census is more than a count: population dynamics are defined by species composition, sex ratios and age structure, that is, by which species are present and how a herd splits into adult males, adult females and juveniles. We use red deer (textitCervus elaphus) as a test case, because managers act on these dynamics and because the visible cue defining adult males, the antlers, is seasonally variable. Surveys are flown nadir, high enough not to disturb the animals, so each deer occupies only a small, low-resolution patch. The two recording modalities fail in opposite conditions: in color a deer under canopy blends into the ground, while in thermal it becomes a bright blob that loses fine detail. Rather than trust either modality alone, we fuse them at every stage using self-supervised DINOv3 features. Our pipeline tracks animals in both modalities, treats an animal as confirmed only when the two cameras agree, keeps only the clear, non-occluded frames, and assigns species and sex by a vote across them; life stage is read separately from geo-referenced body size, since at survey resolution a juvenile often only differs from an adult female in size. Across four flights spanning the antler season the fused pipeline correctly classifies 25 of the 26 detected individuals (7 of 8 adult males, all 16 adult females and 2 juveniles), against 20 of 26 for either sensor alone. Multimodal species classification reaches 96.0%, while for sex classification fusing the two sensors matters most: the combined RGB+thermal model is the most robust across environments and seasons. Automating the demographic classification turns a drone flight from a count into a repeatable reading of herd structure, so the sex ratios and age structure that managers already act on can be gathered as often as a survey can be flown.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.
Builds on
17 of 39 references.
References · 17
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2016Simple Online and Realtime Trackingcited by 868
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
- 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 786
- 2017DOTA: A Large-scale Dataset for Object Detection in Aerial Imagescited by 623
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2020A Metric Learning Reality Checkcited by 321
- 2018Markerless tracking of user-defined features with deep learningcited by 206
- 2022APT-36K: A Large-scale Benchmark for Animal Pose Estimation and Trackingcited by 56
- 2023WildlifeDatasets: An open-source toolkit for animal re-identificationcited by 49
5 more
- 2019Half a Percent of Labels is Enough: Efficient Animal Detection in UAV Imagery using Deep CNNs and Active Learningcited by 22
- 2024BuckTales : A multi-UAV dataset for multi-object tracking and re-identification of wild antelopescited by 14
- 2026Overhead Wildlife Locator (OWL): Benchmarking Weakly Supervised Learning for Aerial Wildlife Surveyscited by 1
- 2026Autonomous UAV Navigation for Individual Wildlife Re-Identificationcited by 1
- 2026Oh Deer, How Should I Handle This? Seasonal Priors for Selective Wildlife Annotation and Classificationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.