mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AgentChaos: Chaos Engineering for Agent Systems via Programmatic Fault Injection

arXiv 2608.06790 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.SEcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Agent systems rely on LLM APIs for every response, but these APIs can return server errors, truncated responses, or corrupted content that propagates through downstream agents and causes task failure. Evaluating robustness under these faults is crucial for reliable deployment. Existing fault injection methods are offline, require source code modification, or cannot modify specific response fields. A comprehensive evaluation also requires a systematic fault taxonomy because different fault types affect downstream agents differently. We propose AgentChaos, a chaos engineering framework for controlled, runtime, non-intrusive LLM API fault injection. Since all agent systems access LLMs through the same HTTP interface, we inject faults at this shared layer without modifying source code. We define crash, omission, and value faults on content and tool call fields, intercept and modify LLM API responses at runtime, and verify whether each fault is triggered to filter untriggered tasks and avoid underestimating fault impact. Evaluations across agent systems, benchmarks, and backbone LLMs under 65 fault configurations show that all systems degrade under fault injection, with pass@1 dropping by up to 50 percentage points. The ranking is consistent across models, suggesting that robustness depends on system implementation rather than model capability. Existing fault diagnosis methods achieve below 53% accuracy on fault type and below 56% on fault step, leaving room for improvement. We further reveal practical findings for agent system developers.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 23 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

23 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Cloud-OpsBench: A Reproducible Benchmark for Agentic Root Cause Analysis in Cloud Systems28 Feb
  2. 2026LIDL: LLM Integration Defect Localization via Knowledge Graph-Enhanced Multi-Agent Analysis9 Jan
  3. 2025Scalable Supervision for Software Agents via Patch Reasoning26 Oct
  4. 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures29 Sep
  5. 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?3 Sep
  6. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar
  7. 2024Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Collaboration Networks for Software Development22 Oct

Other references · 16

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  3. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  4. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  5. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
  6. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 895
  7. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
  8. 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
  9. 2025Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agentscited by 190
  10. 2024On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agentscited by 92
  11. 2023What Do Users Ask in Open-Source AI Repositories? An Empirical Study of GitHub Issuescited by 8
  12. 2024A Survey on Failure Analysis and Fault Injection in AI Systemscited by 7
4 more
  1. 2025CallNavi, A Challenge and Empirical Study on LLM Function Calling and Routingcited by 6
  2. 2026Engineering Pitfalls in AI Coding Tools: An Empirical Study of Bugs in Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLIcited by 5
  3. 2026Schema First Tool APIs for LLM Agents: A Controlled Study of Tool Misuse, Recovery, and Budgeted Performancecited by 4
  4. 2026Why Does the LLM Stop Computing: An Empirical Study of User-Reported Failures in Open-Source LLMscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026When Agentic Executions Fail: Detecting and Localizing Runtime Faults from Telemetry
  2. 2026MAS-FIRE: Fault Injection and Reliability Evaluation for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
  3. 2026Observability and Fault Injection for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering
  4. 2026Characterizing Faults in Agentic AI: A Taxonomy of Types, Symptoms, and Root Causes
  5. 2026ReliabilityBench: Evaluating LLM Agent Reliability Under Production-Like Stress Conditions
  6. 2026Automated structural testing of LLM-based agents: methods, framework, and case studies
  7. 2026AgentFixer: From Failure Detection to Fix Recommendations in LLM Agentic Systems
  8. 2026Understanding Agent-Reactive Bugs at the Model-Harness Boundary: An Empirical Study of LLM Agent Issue Reports