mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Suppress and Diversify: Refining Robust Pathways for Corruption Robustness

arXiv 2608.06712 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model robustness against natural image corruptions is essential for safety-critical applications. While existing methods primarily focus on implicit representation learning, we provide the first systematic exploration of computational pathways to explicitly characterize internal robustness. We identify a progressive decay of robust features across network layers and establish a functional dependency between the prevalence of these features and model performance. To exploit these insights, we propose Suppress and Diversify (S&D), a non-intrusive refinement approach that enhances robustness by dynamically selecting robust pathways and diversifying them through symmetry-preserving transformations. S&D is architecture-agnostic, parameter-free, and incurs zero test-time overhead. Extensive evaluations across eight benchmarks demonstrate that S&D consistently improves performance across multiple vision tasks, diverse backbones, and complex real-world scenarios, highlighting its broad efficacy and scalability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 86 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2026.

Builds on

86 of 105 references.

References · 86

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  7. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  8. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  9. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  10. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  11. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  12. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
38 more
  1. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  2. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
  3. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  4. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  6. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,479
  7. 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,351
  8. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  9. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  10. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  11. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  12. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  13. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  14. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,385
  15. 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,276
  16. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
  17. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,069
  18. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  19. 2018Dual Attention Network for Scene Segmentationcited by 1,003
  20. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
  21. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
  22. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  23. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  24. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
  25. 2018CCNet: Criss-Cross Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 718
  26. 2021MobileViT: Light-weight, General-purpose, and Mobile-friendly Vision Transformercited by 642
  27. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
  28. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 454
  29. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
  30. 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 368
  31. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 336
  32. 2019GCNet: Non-local Networks Meet Squeeze-Excitation Networks and Beyondcited by 331
  33. 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 293
  34. 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
  35. 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
  36. 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
  37. 2021TrivialAugment: Tuning-free Yet State-of-the-Art Data Augmentationcited by 227
  38. 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205

50 most cited of 86 All 86 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.