NxN E-valuation: Hypothesis Certification via a Conformal CRT Null
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose NxN E-valuation, a handy, e-value-based hypothesis-certification algorithm that lets a hypothesis be verified without building any case-specific certification procedure---such as constructing a dedicated null hypothesis---as long as a large enough dataset is available. The method is especially suited to LLM-based exploration systems, where LLMs are remarkably good at proposing hypotheses but suffer badly from hallucination; this hallucination prevents us from harvesting LLM outputs directly, and existing remedies each fall short. The most common solutions include letting the LLM verify or correct itself circular verification and held-out testing (where false hypotheses can still pass via spurious correlations), among other remedies detailed in the introduction. To resolve this, NxN E-valuation exploits the naturally existing large training set and lets different samples serve as null hypotheses for one another. This design directly realizes a conditional randomization test (CRT) that certifies each hypothesis. The approach can be a universally better replacement for at least LLM circular verification and held-out-data testing, provided the LLM's generations are hypotheses that apply to each individual sample.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.
Builds on
20 of 37 references.
References · 20
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
- 2024When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMscited by 230
- 2019Predictive inference with the jackknife+cited by 206
- 2019Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approachescited by 181
- 2020Estimating means of bounded random variables by bettingcited by 164
- 2022Game-theoretic statistics and safe anytime-valid inferencecited by 145
- 2021Testing for Outliers with Conformal p-valuescited by 133
- 2016Panning for Gold: Model-X Knockoffs for High-dimensional Controlled Variable Selectioncited by 120
- 2019Safe Testingcited by 98
- 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 68
- 2021There are natural scores: Full comment on Shafer, "Testing by betting: A strategy for statistical and scientific communication"cited by 49
8 more
- 2019Testing randomnesscited by 32
- 2025A Survey on Hypothesis Generation for Scientific Discovery in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2021The Simpson's Paradox in the Offline Evaluation of Recommendation Systemscited by 16
- 2022Model-X Sequential Testing for Conditional Independence via Testing by Bettingcited by 14
- 2015Fast and Memory-Efficient Significant Pattern Mining via Permutation Testingcited by 8
- 2022E-Statistics, Group Invariance and Anytime Valid Testingcited by 8
- 2023Measuring Evidence against Exchangeability and Group Invariance with E-valuescited by 7
- 2024Learning Representations for Independence Testingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.