mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TradeVerse: A Longitudinal Benchmark of Political Negotiation in International Trade

arXiv 2608.06549 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LLMs are increasingly being applied to tasks involving institutional and political texts, but existing benchmarks evaluate them on isolated documents or single tasks. In realpolitik, negotiations are longitudinal data, where participating parties can align or argue over multiple iterations and each turn is an outcome of the previous turns, hence, understanding one turn requires tracking everything before it. We introduce TradeVerse, a benchmark built from the World Trade Organisation (WTO) specific trade concerns, where member states challenge one another and exchange arguments over multiple rounds, sometimes for years. We, in TradeVerse, reconstruct minutes of 1170 meetings, spanning across 5 groups and 89 product groups and define three tasks: first, the system has to analyze the longitudinal meeting records and predict the harmonized system codes (HS chapters) of the products under discussion in the particular meeting, second, we examine whether the system, upon analyzing the anonymized content of the meeting, can guess the name of the responding country and third, we ask the system to play the role of the responding country and provide the statement for the very last round. All labels are recovered directly from the proceedings, requiring no manual annotation. Our experiments highlight the challenges these tasks pose for current LLMs. To the best of our knowledge, TradeVerseis the first benchmark to investigate potential of LLMs in understanding longitudinal political trade negotiations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2026.

Builds on

21 of 31 references.

References · 21

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
  5. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  6. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
  7. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  8. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
  9. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
  10. 2025Kimi-VL Technical Reportcited by 381
  11. 2024BABILong: Testing the Limits of LLMs with Long Context Reasoning-in-a-Haystackcited by 211
  12. 2024TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Frameworkcited by 182
9 more
  1. 2024Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluationcited by 181
  2. 2024How Well Can LLMs Negotiate? NegotiationArena Platform and Analysiscited by 93
  3. 2024Game-theoretic LLM: Agent Workflow for Negotiation Gamescited by 55
  4. 2025StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets?cited by 43
  5. 2026Nemotron 3 Ultra: Open, Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Model for Agentic Reasoningcited by 32
  6. 2024Are LLMs Effective Negotiators? Systematic Evaluation of the Multifaceted Capabilities of LLMs in Negotiation Dialoguescited by 29
  7. 2025Benchmarking LLMs for Political Science: A United Nations Perspectivecited by 9
  8. 2024Legal Minds, Algorithmic Decisions: How LLMs Apply Constitutional Principles in Complex Scenarioscited by 7
  9. 2025"As Eastern Powers, I will veto." : An Investigation of Nation-level Bias of Large Language Models in International Relationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.