C3PO: Evaluating Cross-Modal Composition and Counterfactual Performance in Omnimodal Models
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can process diverse sensory inputs, yet their reasoning remains heavily biased toward a dominant modality, resulting in brittle cross-modal reasoning. We introduce C3PO, a benchmark of 3,404 samples spanning video, audio, image, and text, evaluating two abilities: information composition (fusing dispersed evidence) and counterfactual conflict (resolving deliberate contradictions). C3PO's paired IC/CC structure and four-tier design enable targeted diagnosis of when and why cross-modal reasoning fails. Built through a fully automatic pipeline using 25 logically grounded templates, C3PO reveals that while humans achieve 88.64% accuracy, the best model (Gemini-3.1-Pro) reaches only 73.17%, with open-source models collapsing under conflict. Through attention probes, we find 86-95% of failures stem from modality dominance: models commit to one modality while ignoring contradictory evidence, concentrating 87-95% of attention on text. Mid-layer attention entropy predicts correctness-sustained exploration succeeds, premature collapse fails. The 56-point accuracy gap between equally complex templates reveals that performance depends on modalities' structural roles in conflict resolution, not combinations. These findings show multimodal perception does not guarantee robust reasoning; architectures must enable sustained cross-modal attention to avoid premature
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 27 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.
Builds on
27 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Some Modalities are More Equal Than Others: Decoding and Architecting Multimodal Integration in MLLMs28 Nov
- 2025MLLMs are Deeply Affected by Modality Bias24 May
- 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAs3 Mar
- 2025VITA-1.5: Towards GPT-4o Level Real-Time Vision and Speech Interaction3 Jan
Other references · 23
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
- 2021Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Videocited by 1,530
- 2019HowTo100M: Learning a Text-Video Embedding by Watching Hundred Million Narrated Video Clipscited by 946
- 2018Scaling Egocentric Vision: The EPIC-KITCHENS Datasetcited by 789
- 2020Rescaling Egocentric Visioncited by 529
- 2023AudioLDM 2: Learning Holistic Audio Generation with Self-supervised Pretrainingcited by 343
- 2019What Makes Training Multi-Modal Classification Networks Hard?cited by 340
- 2025WorldSense: Evaluating Real-world Omnimodal Understanding for Multimodal LLMscited by 147
- 2022Modality Competition: What Makes Joint Training of Multi-modal Network Fail in Deep Learning? (Provably)cited by 115
- 2019Oops! Predicting Unintentional Action in Videocited by 82
11 more
- 2024The Curse of Multi-Modalities: Evaluating Hallucinations of Large Multimodal Models across Language, Visual, and Audiocited by 48
- 2025Audio-centric Video Understanding Benchmark without Text Shortcutcited by 33
- 2025Pixels Versus Priors: Controlling Knowledge Priors in Vision-Language Models through Visual Counterfactscited by 30
- 2025Right Answer, Wrong Score: Uncovering the Inconsistencies of LLM Evaluation in Multiple-Choice Question Answeringcited by 27
- 2026Do Audio-Visual Large Language Models Really See and Hear?cited by 9
- 2025MAVERIX: Multimodal Audio-Visual Evaluation and Recognition IndeXcited by 7
- 2025AURA: A Fine-Grained Benchmark and Decomposed Metric for Audio-Visual Reasoningcited by 7
- 2025DAVE: Diagnostic benchmark for Audio Visual Evaluationcited by 5
- 2025FysicsWorld: A Unified Full-Modality Benchmark for Any-to-Any Understanding, Generation, and Reasoningcited by 5
- 2025XModBench: Benchmarking Cross-Modal Capabilities and Consistency in Omni-Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026SONIC-O1: A Real-World Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models on Audio-Video Understandingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Compose and Fuse: Revisiting the Foundational Bottlenecks in Multimodal Reasoning
- 2025Mitigating Modal Imbalance in Multimodal Reasoning
- 2024OmniBench: Towards The Future of Universal Omni-Language Models
- 2026Evaluating Cross-Modal Reasoning Ability and Problem Characteristics with Multimodal Item Response Theory
- 2026Cross-Modal Coreference Alignment: Enabling Reliable Information Transfer in Omni-LLMs
- 2025Contra4: Evaluating Contrastive Cross-Modal Reasoning in Audio, Video, Image, and 3D
- 2025Daily-Omni: Towards Audio-Visual Reasoning with Temporal Alignment across Modalities
- 2026Modality Fault Lines: Structural Corruptions Reveal Fragile Omni-Modal Reasoning