mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic Detection of Deaths from Social Networking Sites

arXiv 2608.05183 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2026cs.SI cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This dissertation analysed and discussed the differences in linguistic characteristics between pre-mortem and post-mortem social media content, and reported machine learning (ML) classifiers that achieved high performance in automatically detecting deaths of social networking site users from posts associated with their profiles. A new dataset was developed using Wikidata and Twitter. ML models, both traditional (RF, KNN, LR, and SVM) and deep learning (BiLSTM, CNN, and the state-of-the-art BERT), were trained on features extracted using TF-IDF and pre-trained embeddings (Glove, Word2Vec, and FastText) to classify post-mortem content from its pre-mortem counterpart. The results showed that RF outperformed all other traditional ML models; BiLSTM outperformed CNN; TF-IDF consistently outperformed pre-trained word embeddings for the traditional models; Word2Vec consistently outperformed Glove and FastText for the deep learning models; and BERT outperformed all other models. It was found that although pre-mortem and post-mortem tweets express similar levels of positive sentiment, post-mortem tweets exhibit higher negative sentiment, whereas pre-mortem tweets exhibit higher neutral sentiment. Feelings suggesting negativity (sad, angry, surprise, and fear) are more dominant in post-mortem tweets, while happy is more dominant in pre-mortem tweets. It was also found that words, personal pronouns, verbs, family words, religious words, death words, and swear words occur more frequently in post-mortem tweets, whereas impersonal pronouns and informal words occur more frequently in pre-mortem tweets. Additionally, analytical thinking is expressed more in post-mortem than pre-mortem conversations. This experiment's significant contribution is the successful development of an exceptionally high-performing technique for automatically detecting user deaths on social networking sites.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 153 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.

Builds on

8 of 153 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
  3. 2019Fake News Detection on Social Media using Geometric Deep Learningcited by 118
  4. 2014word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.'s negative-sampling word-embedding methodcited by 112
  5. 2020Comparing BERT against traditional machine learning text classificationcited by 46
  6. 2014Effective Use of Word Order for Text Categorization with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 40
  7. 2019"Why Should You Trust My Explanation?" Understanding Uncertainty in LIME Explanationscited by 9
  8. 2021TF-IDF vs Word Embeddings for Morbidity Identification in Clinical Notes: An Initial Studycited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.