Automatic Detection of Deaths from Social Networking Sites
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This dissertation analysed and discussed the differences in linguistic characteristics between pre-mortem and post-mortem social media content, and reported machine learning (ML) classifiers that achieved high performance in automatically detecting deaths of social networking site users from posts associated with their profiles. A new dataset was developed using Wikidata and Twitter. ML models, both traditional (RF, KNN, LR, and SVM) and deep learning (BiLSTM, CNN, and the state-of-the-art BERT), were trained on features extracted using TF-IDF and pre-trained embeddings (Glove, Word2Vec, and FastText) to classify post-mortem content from its pre-mortem counterpart. The results showed that RF outperformed all other traditional ML models; BiLSTM outperformed CNN; TF-IDF consistently outperformed pre-trained word embeddings for the traditional models; Word2Vec consistently outperformed Glove and FastText for the deep learning models; and BERT outperformed all other models. It was found that although pre-mortem and post-mortem tweets express similar levels of positive sentiment, post-mortem tweets exhibit higher negative sentiment, whereas pre-mortem tweets exhibit higher neutral sentiment. Feelings suggesting negativity (sad, angry, surprise, and fear) are more dominant in post-mortem tweets, while happy is more dominant in pre-mortem tweets. It was also found that words, personal pronouns, verbs, family words, religious words, death words, and swear words occur more frequently in post-mortem tweets, whereas impersonal pronouns and informal words occur more frequently in pre-mortem tweets. Additionally, analytical thinking is expressed more in post-mortem than pre-mortem conversations. This experiment's significant contribution is the successful development of an exceptionally high-performing technique for automatically detecting user deaths on social networking sites.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 153 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
8 of 153 references.
References · 8
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2019Fake News Detection on Social Media using Geometric Deep Learningcited by 118
- 2014word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.'s negative-sampling word-embedding methodcited by 112
- 2020Comparing BERT against traditional machine learning text classificationcited by 46
- 2014Effective Use of Word Order for Text Categorization with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 40
- 2019"Why Should You Trust My Explanation?" Understanding Uncertainty in LIME Explanationscited by 9
- 2021TF-IDF vs Word Embeddings for Morbidity Identification in Clinical Notes: An Initial Studycited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.