IRIS: A Visual Cortex-Inspired Framework for Analyzing Orientation Selectivity in Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision transformers (ViTs) have become the de facto standard for image encoding across many perception tasks. Despite their empirical success, it remains mechanistically unclear how they encode low-level features, given their lack of inductive biases: ViTs process information globally rather than relying on local structure. Biological visual systems, in contrast, build low-level features, such as orientation selectivity in the primary visual cortex, by combining information from small, localized regions of the visual field. These features are general-purpose representations, shared and required across multiple specialized neural pathways, unlike higher-level, task-specific semantic features. This raises the question if such biologically-grounded features arise in ViTs. In this work, we systematically study how orientation selectivity emerges in ViTs by introducing a suite of neuroscience-inspired metrics: representational similarity score (RSS), orientation recruitment score (ORS), and orientation tuning bandwidth to quantify how orientation is encoded in representational geometry and as a function of model depth. Through extensive analysis, we find that: (1) the training paradigm is the strongest determinant of orientation selectivity, with models sharing an objective, peaking at comparable relative depths regardless of scale (2) many units are orientation-selective early in training, with early-to-middle layers recruiting more such units over time, while deeper layers lose selectivity and broaden their tuning toward semantic encoding and (3) our metrics offer a mechanistic heuristic for how many layers to unfreeze for best downstream generalization. Our framework presents a way to track biologically-grounded features during ViT training, probes how desired properties are encoded in transformer representations, and builds a systematic understanding of how ViTs generalize across tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.
Builds on
29 of 52 references.
References · 29
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
- 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,165
- 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,087
- 2022R3M: A Universal Visual Representation for Robot Manipulationcited by 694
- 2025Depth Anything 3: Recovering the Visual Space from Any Viewscited by 692
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
17 more
- 2018Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learningcited by 634
- 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
- 2022Mask DINO: Towards A Unified Transformer-based Framework for Object Detection and Segmentationcited by 344
- 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 245
- 2023Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence?cited by 218
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 196
- 2021Are Convolutional Neural Networks or Transformers more like human vision?cited by 109
- 2024Multimodal Autoregressive Pre-training of Large Vision Encoderscited by 109
- 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 60
- 2017FreezeOut: Accelerate Training by Progressively Freezing Layerscited by 54
- 2016Highway and Residual Networks learn Unrolled Iterative Estimationcited by 52
- 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoderscited by 38
- 2025Prisma: An Open Source Toolkit for Mechanistic Interpretability in Vision and Videocited by 21
- 2024Decomposing and Interpreting Image Representations via Text in ViTs Beyond CLIPcited by 20
- 2025Disentangling the Factors of Convergence between Brains and Computer Vision Modelscited by 13
- 2025Do computer vision foundation models learn the low-level characteristics of the human visual system?cited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.