Automatic Statistical Test for Rationally Expressible Algorithms by Selective Inference, with Applications to Feature Selection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Selective inference (SI) provides statistically valid p-values for hypotheses selected by applying an algorithm to the data, correcting for the bias that arises when the same data are used both to select and to test a hypothesis. Developing an SI procedure for a new algorithm, however, has required an expert to derive, and then implement, the selection event, i.e., the conditions under which the hypothesis is selected. Repeating this specialized effort for every new algorithm is why exact SI has so far been available for only a narrow class. We propose AutoSI, a framework that removes this barrier in two ways. First, AutoSI constructs the selection event automatically from the algorithm's individual operations, so the user only writes the algorithm as ordinary NumPy-like code and derives nothing by hand. Second, AutoSI broadens the class of selection events SI can handle: existing exact methods are limited to selection events characterized by linear or quadratic inequalities in the data, whereas AutoSI covers any algorithm expressible through rational functions of the data (ratios of polynomials). We prove that the p-values computed by AutoSI are exactly valid in finite samples. We demonstrate AutoSI on three feature-selection methods, each written in a few dozen lines of code. One of these methods, the lasso with its tuning parameter selected by cross-validated R2, cannot be handled within existing exact SI frameworks and is made possible by AutoSI. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets show that the resulting p-values control the type I error rate (i.e., the false positive rate) at the nominal level while retaining high power.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.
Builds on
17 of 22 references.
References · 17
- 2013Exact post-selection inference, with application to the lassocited by 91
- 2014Optimal Inference After Model Selectioncited by 67
- 2014Exact Post-Selection Inference for Sequential Regression Procedurescited by 48
- 2020Selective Inference for Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 39
- 2019Testing for a Change in Mean After Changepoint Detectioncited by 26
- 2021More Powerful Conditional Selective Inference for Generalized Lasso by Parametric Programmingcited by 25
- 2022Selective inference for k-means clusteringcited by 22
- 2020Quantifying Statistical Significance of Neural Network-based Image Segmentation by Selective Inferencecited by 21
- 2023Valid P-Value for Deep Learning-Driven Salient Regioncited by 17
- 2021Conditional Selective Inference for Robust Regression and Outlier Detection using Piecewise-Linear Homotopy Continuationcited by 16
- 2014Exact Post Model Selection Inference for Marginal Screeningcited by 12
- 2017Unifying approach to selective inference with applications to cross-validationcited by 9
5 more
- 2024Statistical Test for Anomaly Detections by Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 7
- 2024Statistical Test for Attention Map in Vision Transformercited by 6
- 2015Selective inference after cross-validationcited by 4
- 2024Statistical Test for Feature Selection Pipelines by Selective Inferencecited by 3
- 2024Statistical Test for Auto Feature Engineering by Selective Inferencecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.