Eigenius: A Typed Knowledge-Graph DBMS with Epistemic Stratification and Institution-Mediated Reasoning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As "AI Scientists" emerge to drive research via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), systems relying on ephemeral scripts will fail. The sheer scale of stateful, interconnected evidence requires a machine-walkable warranty grounded in a purpose-built database architecture. Eigenius is an open-source, typed knowledge-graph DBMS built on a single premise: answering the audit question ("what do you know, and what is your warranty?") requires a unified kernel. By tightly coupling the type system, storage engine, and integration protocol, Eigenius turns data provenance into a structural invariant rather than a property reconstructed across subsystem boundaries. The kernel rests on three pillars: a dependent type theory woven through the core, institutions acting as strongly typed integration boundaries, and a content-addressed immutable storage layer. On this foundation, epistemic status (declared/observed/derived/verified) is enforced as a strict commit-time invariant. Cross-system translations (comorphisms) are checked at commit and materialized directly into the graph as durable, first-class resources. To eliminate O(N^2) polystore bottlenecks, shared on-chain intermediate representations (IRs) collapse multi-system translations to identity. Crucially, this architecture unifies both domains of scientific epistemology: it relies on justification logic for empirical science, while embedding a fast, in-process term checker to safely evaluate formal mathematical proofs (via Lean 4) without IPC overhead. In an end-to-end recomputation of a published Nature study from fragile scripts to a materialized evidence graph, all 52 derived conclusions hold from pinned data, surfacing four machine-checked discrepancies in the original study.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.
Builds on
0 of 21 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Composable Trust Infrastructure for Manufacturing Knowledge Graphs: Cross-System Provenance, Temporal Reasoning, and Decision Traceability
- 2026TRACE: An Operational Reasoning Schema for Auditable Agentic Commitments
- 2026Bridging LLM Agents and Data Spaces: An Architectural Mediation Approach using the Model Context Protocol
- 2026FinRCA-Bench: Benchmarking Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning for Financial AI Systems
- 2026Stored Is Not Supported: Typed Provenance and Assertion Guardrails for Persistent AI Agents
- 2026Reconcile Once, Write Anytime: A Trust-Tiered Librarian and a Multi-Agent Writer for Drift-Free, Point-in-Time Research
- 2026Retrieval Is Not Enough: Why Organizational AI Needs Epistemic Infrastructure
- 2026YouRA: A Persistent-State Architecture for Evidence-Traceable Autonomous Research Agents