mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EdgeLM: Edge Demonstrations for Language Models' Table Understanding

arXiv 2608.04390 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.DBcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) perform table-centric prediction through in-context learning, making demonstration selection critical to performance. Existing retrieval methods prioritize similarity to the query, but similar demonstrations often reinforce the model's likely prediction rather than reveal the distinctions needed for difficult decisions. We propose EdgeLM, a retrieval framework that instead selects edge evidence, demonstrations that are both relevant to the query and informative about the decision boundary. EdgeLM retrieves two complementary forms of edge evidence by selecting data edges, nearby examples with different ground-truth labels, and model edges, similar examples previously misclassified by the deployed model. EdgeLM requires neither model retraining nor task-specific engineering. Across five data wrangling tasks, fifteen datasets, and five open-weight and proprietary LLMs, EdgeLM consistently achieves the best or near-best performance in every setting, while ablations show that the two forms of edge evidence provide complementary benefits. Our code and datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/soroushomidvar/EdgeLM.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2026.

Builds on

28 of 49 references.

References · 28

  1. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
  2. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
  3. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
  4. 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
  5. 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 648
  6. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
  7. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
  8. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 398
  9. 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 294
  10. 2022Selective Annotation Makes Language Models Better Few-Shot Learnerscited by 243
  11. 2021TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executorcited by 235
  12. 2024Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table Understandingcited by 188
16 more
  1. 2022Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?cited by 175
  2. 2024Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Surveycited by 159
  3. 2020Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 144
  4. 2022Diverse Demonstrations Improve In-context Compositional Generalizationcited by 139
  5. 2023TableLlama: Towards Open Large Generalist Models for Tablescited by 137
  6. 2022TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encodingcited by 91
  7. 2023In-Context Learning with Iterative Demonstration Selectioncited by 74
  8. 2024TableRAG: Million-Token Table Understanding with Language Modelscited by 41
  9. 2020Valentine: Evaluating Matching Techniques for Dataset Discoverycited by 35
  10. 2024LLM-Forest: Ensemble Learning of LLMs with Graph-Augmented Prompts for Data Imputationcited by 25
  11. 2024Anomaly Detection of Tabular Data Using LLMscited by 12
  12. 2025On LLM-Enhanced Mixed-Type Data Imputation with High-Order Message Passingcited by 11
  13. 2015Truth Finding on the Deep Web: Is the Problem Solved?cited by 10
  14. 2025LDI: Localized Data Imputation for Text-Rich Tablescited by 2
  15. 2026SynSQL: Synthesizing Relational Databases for Robust Evaluation of Text-to-SQL Systemscited by 2
  16. 2025SQL-Exchange: Transforming SQL Queries Across Domainscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.