LiNC: Lightweight Noise Correction via Per-Sample Trust and Gaussian Mixture Modeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Label noise is common in medical imaging datasets due to factors such as inter-rater variability, annotation errors, and ambiguous cases. This can severely undermine the reliability and clinical effectiveness of machine learning models trained using those datasets. To address this challenge, we introduce Lightweight Noise Correction (LiNC), which adds a single trainable trust parameter per training sample and learns when to use the observed label and when to defer to the model during a standard training loop. The key idea is to train using a convex combination of the observed label and the model's own predictive distribution, controlled by a per-sample trust parameter. We show that the gradient of this objective drives trust values in opposite directions for clean versus noisy samples in the early training phase, yielding separable trust distributions. We use a 3-component Gaussian Mixture Model over the trust values to separate them into clean, ambiguous, and noisy cases and then execute a short soft-correction phase on the noisy cases and a final hard correction phase. Experiments on ten 2D datasets from MedMNISTv2 under label noise of up to 50% show consistent gains in accuracy and strong mislabel detection. LiNC adds negligible asymptotic overhead: the training-time complexity remains dominated by the base network, with additional memory growing linearly with the size of the training set.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
23 of 29 references.
References · 23
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 682
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
11 more
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
- 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
- 2020Estimating Example Difficulty Using Variance of Gradientscited by 96
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2020ProSelfLC: Progressive Self Label Correction for Training Robust Deep Neural Networkscited by 33
- 2024Dissecting Sample Hardness: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Hardness Characterization Methods for Data-Centric AIcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.