LatentGuard: Efficient and Inspectable Latent Reasoning for LLM Safeguards
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
Reasoning-based large language model (LLM) safeguards improve safety classification accuracy by generating explicit rationales before making decisions. However, generating explicit rationales adds substantial decoding overhead to every safety decision, while readable explanations are needed only for on-demand audits. This mismatch motivates RscriptstyleEALGscriptstyleUARD, a reliable, efficient, and auditable framework for LLM safeguards that decouples safety reasoning from rationale generation via latent reasoning. During training, a task-aligned curriculum progressively replaces explicit rationales with continuous latent reasoning under supervision from the remaining rationale text and final safety labels. In parallel, a lightweight audit decoder is trained to generate explanations conditioned on interaction text and latent states under supervision from condensed task-level rationales. At inference, the guard model makes safety decisions through continuous latent reasoning with adaptive stopping, while the audit decoder generates concise explanations when needed. Evaluations of 1B, 3B, and 8B models show that RscriptstyleEALGscriptstyleUARD improves mean F1 score by up to 1.76 points over GuardReasoner, with up to 15.7× speedups and up to 166.7× reductions in reasoning token usage during routine safety classification, while its audit decoder achieves up to 87.73% explanation acceptability under LLM-based evaluation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 15 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
15 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025OmniGuard: Unified Omni-Modal Guardrails with Deliberate Reasoning2 Dec
- 2025GuardReasoner: Towards Reasoning-based LLM Safeguards30 Jan
Other references · 13
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
- 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 797
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 703
- 2025Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Thinkcited by 415
- 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetycited by 249
- 2024Compressed Chain of Thought: Efficient Reasoning Through Dense Representationscited by 201
- 2023Implicit Chain of Thought Reasoning via Knowledge Distillationcited by 176
- 2024AEGIS: Online Adaptive AI Content Safety Moderation with Ensemble of LLM Expertscited by 136
- 2023SimpleSafetyTests: a Test Suite for Identifying Critical Safety Risks in Large Language Modelscited by 76
- 2025GSPR: Aligning LLM Safeguards as Generalizable Safety Policy Reasonerscited by 13
- 2025Taxonomy-Adaptive Moderation Model with Robust Guardrails for Large Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Robust and Efficient Guardrails with Latent Reasoning
- 2025ReasoningGuard: Safeguarding Large Reasoning Models with Inference-time Safety Aha Moments
- 2026Self-Guard: Defending Large Reasoning Models via enhanced self-reflection
- 2026A Dual-Hypothesis Reasoning Framework for LLM Guardrails
- 2026DT-Guard: Intent-Driven Reasoning-Active Training for Reasoning-Free LLM Safety Guardrail
- 2026Efficient Safety Guardrails through Latent Dual-Hypothesis Reasoning with On-Demand Trace Reconstruction
- 2026LPG: Balancing Efficiency and Policy Reasoning in Latent Policy Guardrails
- 2026TraceGuard: Process-Guided Firewall against Reasoning Backdoors in Large Language Models