mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ToolLIFT: Lifting Tool-Specific Trajectories into Function-Level Graphs for Generalizable Tool Planning

arXiv 2608.03468 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Historical tool-use trajectories provide valuable experience for large language model (LLM) agents to plan and coordinate tool usage. Existing approaches directly construct tool-level graphs from these trajectories, but the resulting graphs remain tied to specific tools and are hard to generalize across tool sets. To tackle this challenge, we find that despite differences in the tools involved, analogous tasks often share a common function-level workflow structure, which serves as a potentially more transferable abstraction for tool planning. Based on this insight, we propose ToolLIFT, a framework that lifts tool-specific trajectories into a function-level workflow graph (FWG) for generalizable tool planning. Specifically, we first propose a trajectory-lifting mechanism that encodes workflow structures in the FWG and shares collaboration experience across tools. Then, building on the global structure of the FWG, we introduce decoupled workflow planning and tool selection to align individual tool choices with the overall workflow. Lastly, to ensure reliable tool dataflow, we adopt Reinforcement Learning (RL) and propose source-gated and skill-specific rewards to maintain source-traceable information flow across tool calls. Experiments on two in-distribution (ID) and three out-of-distribution (OOD) benchmarks show that ToolLIFT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, demonstrating strong generalization to unseen tool sets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

Builds on

23 of 33 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  4. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  5. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  6. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  7. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
  8. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  9. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
  10. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
  11. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 814
  12. 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Casescited by 383
11 more
  1. 2025ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMscited by 377
  2. 2025ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needscited by 342
  3. 2023TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automationcited by 138
  4. 2023RestGPT: Connecting Large Language Models with Real-World RESTful APIscited by 129
  5. 2026SkillX: Automatically Constructing Skill Knowledge Bases for Agentscited by 69
  6. 2024Seal-Tools: Self-Instruct Tool Learning Dataset for Agent Tuning and Detailed Benchmarkcited by 62
  7. 2024ToolNet: Connecting Large Language Models with Massive Tools via Tool Graphcited by 59
  8. 2024Tool-Planner: Task Planning with Clusters across Multiple Toolscited by 32
  9. 2024StepTool: Enhancing Multi-Step Tool Usage in LLMs via Step-Grained Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  10. 2025Tool Zero: Training Tool-Augmented LLMs via Pure RL from Scratchcited by 17
  11. 2025NaviAgent: Graph-Driven Bilevel Planning for Scalable Tool Orchestrationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.