Structure-Aware Robust Fine-Tuning: Defending Vision-Language-Action Robots Against Physical Attention Hijacking
On the map: Vision-language-action models → Safety and adversarial attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies promise general robotic manipulation, but their robustness against physical-world attacks remains fragile. In particular, we show that physically realizable adversarial patches can reliably induce failures by triggering a mechanism we call policy-critical action-to-vision attention hijacking, where action-conditioned attention is diverted from task-relevant regions to a localized patch. To demonstrate the threat, we propose Attention-Guided Semantic Disruption (AGSD), an Expectation-over-Transformation (EOT) optimized printable patch that jointly (i) concentrates action-to-vision attention on the patch and (ii) disrupts vision-language semantic alignment, yielding strong cross-task and cross-architecture transfer. To mitigate such attacks, we introduce Structure-Aware Robust Fine-Tuning (SARF), a zero-inference-overhead defense that fine-tunes only the visual encoder using feature anchoring, policy-critical attention correction, and language-guided geometric consistency restricted to semantically relevant regions. On LIBERO, SARF reduces OpenVLA's failure rate under AGSD from 100% to 14.2%-56.8% (28.6% average) across suites while preserving clean performance, and on a real PiPER manipulator it improves average success under AGSD from 23.0% to 65.0%. These results highlight mechanism-level robustness as a practical path to securing VLA robots against physical attention hijacking.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety and adversarial attacks, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models. Builds on 25 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.
Builds on
25 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Attention-Guided Patch-Wise Sparse Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models26 Nov
- 2025When Robots Obey the Patch: Universal Transferable Patch Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models26 Nov
- 2025AttackVLA: Benchmarking Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models15 Nov
- 2025Model-agnostic Adversarial Attack and Defense for Vision-Language-Action Models15 Oct
- 2025Eva-VLA: Evaluating Vision-Language-Action Models' Robustness Under Real-World Physical Variations23 Sep
- 2024Exploring the Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics18 Nov
- 2024Manipulation Facing Threats: Evaluating Physical Vulnerabilities in End-to-End Vision Language Action Models20 Sep
Other references · 18
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
- 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,838
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,407
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,498
- 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,484
- 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,410
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
6 more
- 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,077
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
- 2022Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purificationcited by 476
- 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
- 2017PixelDefend: Leveraging Generative Models to Understand and Defend against Adversarial Examplescited by 244
- 2025Robust Finetuning of Vision-Language-Action Robot Policies via Parameter Mergingcited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Beyond Attention Magnitude: Leveraging Inter-layer Rank Consistency for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026VLAGuard: A Framework for Evaluating and Mitigating Physical Attention Hijacking in Vision-Language-Action Robots within Wireless Sensor Networks
- 2026Partially Observable Adversarial Patch Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics
- 2026Stable Language Guidance for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026Restoring Linguistic Grounding in VLA Models via Train-Free Attention Recalibration
- 2026Hidden in Plain Sight: Diffusion-Based Unrestricted Robotic Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026VLA-Hijack: A Transferable Patch Attack against Vision-Language-Action Models via Visual Proprioception Hijacking
- 2026ShieldVLA: Feasibility-Aware Safety Alignment for Vision-Language-Action Models