mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TQLite: Multi-LLM Jury Guided Distillation for Real-time MQM Translation Quality Evaluation

arXiv 2608.02975 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in MQM-based translation quality (TQ) evaluation, and recent advances in large reasoning models (LRMs) promise even greater improvements. However, both LLMs and LRMs are computationally expensive to deploy at scale, while small language models (SLMs)---though much more efficient---struggle with the complex reasoning required for evaluation tasks. In this work, we present an extensive empirical study benchmarking SLMs, LLMs, and LRMs across a wide range of TQ evaluation setups, providing a comprehensive view of the current landscape and establishing best practices. To address the scalability challenge, we introduce TQLite, a novel distillation framework that enables SLMs to approach the MQM evaluation performance of the best LRM-based evaluators. Our approach leverages a multi-LRM jury to generate high-quality synthetic training data via practical data curation techniques and aggregation of evaluation responses across a diverse panel of models. Our results demonstrate that SLMs trained via TQLite achieve strong MQM evaluation performance that far exceeds off-the-shelf evaluation capabilities of standard SLMs, offering a scalable and cost-effective alternative to LLM- and LRM-based evaluators.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 28 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2026.

Builds on

28 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Report14 May

Other references · 27

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  6. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  9. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  10. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  11. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  12. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
15 more
  1. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
  2. 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 575
  3. 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 446
  4. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
  5. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
  6. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  7. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
  8. 2022CometKiwi: IST-Unbabel 2022 Submission for the Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 207
  9. 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 163
  10. 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 158
  11. 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 146
  12. 2024Aya Expanse: Combining Research Breakthroughs for a New Multilingual Frontiercited by 129
  13. 2023Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language Modelscited by 87
  14. 2023Towards Better Chain-of-Thought Prompting Strategies: A Surveycited by 62
  15. 2024MQM-APE: Toward High-Quality Error Annotation Predictors with Automatic Post-Editing in LLM Translation Evaluatorscited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Survey on Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models: Methods, Evaluation, and Application
  2. 2024Quality Matters: Evaluating Synthetic Data for Tool-Using LLMs
  3. 2025MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation
  4. 2024Knowledge Distillation Using Frontier Open-source LLMs: Generalizability and the Role of Synthetic Data
  5. 2026A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data
  6. 2026Are Two LLMs Better Than One? A Student-Teacher Dual-Head LLMs Architecture for Pharmaceutical Content Optimization
  7. 2025How Well Do Large Reasoning Models Translate? A Comprehensive Evaluation for Multi-Domain Machine Translation
  8. 2025From Large to Super-Tiny: End-to-End Optimization for Cost-Efficient LLMs