SPECTRA: Band-Routed Embedding and Stage-Wise LoRA for Cross-Sensor Fine-Tuning of Geospatial Foundation Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Geospatial foundation models (GeoFMs), pretrained on large-scale geospatial data such as Earth observation (EO), climate, and weather data, have shown promising performance when fine-tuned on diverse downstream tasks. However, there are two challenges of adapting EO-pretrained GeoFMs to practical downstream datasets. The first challenge is how to handle spectral mismatch: pretrained patch embeddings expect a fixed set of input bands, whereas downstream sensors may provide different channels. The second challenge is how to reduce fine-tuning cost and make it efficient. While existing work has made efforts on these challenges individually, jointly improving fine-tuning performance under spectral mismatch while reducing adaptation cost remains underexplored. We propose SPECTRA, a parameter-efficient fine-tuning framework that addresses both spectral mismatch and adaptation cost. To handle spectral mismatch, SPECTRA introduces Band-Routed Embedding (BRE), which maps all available downstream bands into the band space expected by the pretrained GeoFM. By using BRE, all available bands in the downstream dataset are utilized to improve the selected-band input without changing the pretrained patch embedding interface. To reduce adaptation cost, SPECTRA further introduces a Stage-wise Transferability-aware LoRA (ST-LoRA) fine-tuning. ST-LoRA estimates stage-wise transferability before fine-tuning and assigns stage-specific LoRA ranks, concentrating trainable parameters on the stages with high transferability for the target task. Across three EO-pretrained GeoFMs and four downstream segmentation datasets, experiments show that BRE improves performance by utilizing all spectral bands, while ST-LoRA reduces trainable parameters compared with full fine-tuning and standard LoRA. Code is available at https://github.com/big-data-lab-umbc/SPECTRA.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.
Builds on
19 of 29 references.
References · 19
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
- 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,265
- 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 560
- 2018End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attentioncited by 533
- 2022SatMAE: Pre-training Transformers for Temporal and Multi-Spectral Satellite Imagerycited by 402
- 2022Scale-MAE: A Scale-Aware Masked Autoencoder for Multiscale Geospatial Representation Learningcited by 302
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 182
- 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 168
7 more
- 2024Prithvi-EO-2.0: A Versatile Multi-Temporal Foundation Model for Earth Observation Applicationscited by 139
- 2023GEO-Bench: Toward Foundation Models for Earth Monitoringcited by 122
- 2024Neural Plasticity-Inspired Multimodal Foundation Model for Earth Observationcited by 97
- 2024AnySat: One Earth Observation Model for Many Resolutions, Scales, and Modalitiescited by 73
- 2024Bridging Remote Sensors with Multisensor Geospatial Foundation Modelscited by 46
- 2022Landslide4Sense: Reference Benchmark Data and Deep Learning Models for Landslide Detectioncited by 26
- 2025Fine-tune Smarter, Not Harder: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Geospatial Foundation Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.