CraftAlign: Feature-Grounded Evaluation and Revision Guidance for AI Stories
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models can now generate fluent and complete stories, yet many outputs still feel formulaic and unnatural because of cliches, over-explanation, linear causal progression, and stereotyped endings, an immediately recognizable AI flavor. Existing detection and evaluation methods often stop at source labels or holistic scores, while revision methods typically target predefined issues through localized edits, limiting their ability to support multiple plausible revision strategies or guide story-wide changes in information release, causal organization, and ending treatment. We introduce CraftAlign, a framework that aligns AI stories with the craft of human storytelling by both assessing Human/AI writing patterns and providing revision guidance. CraftAlign comprises two learned modules and an inference-time guidance pipeline. A feature estimator built on Qwen3.5-9B predicts 304 explicit writing features spanning style and narrative. A class-conditional energy model scores the resulting feature configuration against Human and AI writing patterns, conditioning on the original writing prompt when available. At inference time, CraftAlign applies schema-valid structured perturbations, selects changes that move the feature configuration toward the Human writing pattern, and converts them into natural-language guidance for a separate editor to rewrite the full story. Experiments show that CraftAlign accurately distinguishes Human and AI writing patterns and that its guidance outperforms revision baselines across editors and in a human study.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.
Builds on
14 of 22 references.
References · 14
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 614
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
- 2022Re3: Generating Longer Stories With Recursive Reprompting and Revisioncited by 193
- 2022COLD Decoding: Energy-based Constrained Text Generation with Langevin Dynamicscited by 161
- 2023A Closer Look at the Intervention Procedure of Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 64
- 2021Deep Neural Networks for Rank-Consistent Ordinal Regression Based On Conditional Probabilitiescited by 59
- 2024Can AI writing be salvaged? Mitigating Idiosyncrasies and Improving Human-AI Alignment in the Writing Process through Editscited by 49
- 2023Learning to Receive Help: Intervention-Aware Concept Embedding Modelscited by 41
- 2025People who frequently use ChatGPT for writing tasks are accurate and robust detectors of AI-generated textcited by 40
Built on by
Not cited yet.