The Boy Who Cried Wolf: Adversarial Misclassification of Safe Inputs as Unsafe in Multimodal Guardrails
On the map: LLM safety and security → Vision-language and text-to-image safety
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal guard models have emerged as critical safety components for screening content in vision-language systems. While adversarial research has extensively studied jailbreaking attacks that produce false negatives, the inverse threat of inducing false positives on benign inputs remains unexplored. We introduce Unsafe Induction Attacks, where adversaries distribute imperceptibly perturbed safe images that trigger guard models to reject legitimate user requests, causing a "Boy Who Cried Wolf" effect that degrades service availability and erodes trust. This reveals an availability failure mode in deployed safety filters. To realize this threat under diverse user prompts, we propose Unsafe Semantic Distillation (USD), which aligns adversarial perturbations with distributional representations of unsafe content rather than prompt-specific instances. Evaluated on four state-of-the-art guard models across realistic user simulation scenarios, USD achieves 84% attack success rates, outperforming existing methods and exposing fundamental vulnerabilities in current multimodal safety architectures.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Vision-language and text-to-image safety, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 31 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.
Builds on
31 of 63 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025HoliSafe: Holistic Safety Benchmarking and Modeling for Vision-Language Model5 Jun
- 2025VLM-Guard: Safeguarding Vision-Language Models via Fulfilling Safety Alignment Gap14 Feb
- 2023FigStep: Jailbreaking Large Vision-Language Models via Typographic Visual Prompts9 Nov
- 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models22 Jun
Other references · 27
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
- 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 909
- 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 712
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 518
- 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 412
- 2023Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?cited by 315
- 2022Towards Adversarial Attack on Vision-Language Pre-training Modelscited by 144
- 2024The Revolution of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 137
- 2024Llama Guard 3 Vision: Safeguarding Human-AI Image Understanding Conversationscited by 129
- 2023Abusing Images and Sounds for Indirect Instruction Injection in Multi-Modal LLMscited by 124
- 2020Sponge Examples: Energy-Latency Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 111
15 more
- 2025MM-RLHF: The Next Step Forward in Multimodal LLM Alignmentcited by 83
- 2024UnsafeBench: Benchmarking Image Safety Classifiers on Real-World and AI-Generated Imagescited by 53
- 2022NICGSlowDown: Evaluating the Efficiency Robustness of Neural Image Caption Generation Modelscited by 50
- 2025T2ISafety: Benchmark for Assessing Fairness, Toxicity, and Privacy in Image Generationcited by 48
- 2024AI Risk Categorization Decoded (AIR 2024): From Government Regulations to Corporate Policiescited by 37
- 2025A Frustratingly Simple Yet Highly Effective Attack Baseline: Over 90% Success Rate Against the Strong Black-box Models of GPT-4.5/4o/o1cited by 37
- 2021On the Efficacy of Adversarial Data Collection for Question Answering: Results from a Large-Scale Randomized Studycited by 31
- 2025OmniAlign-V: Towards Enhanced Alignment of MLLMs with Human Preferencecited by 28
- 2024Post-Training Attribute Unlearning in Recommender Systemscited by 24
- 2025Bridging the Copyright Gap: Do Large Vision-Language Models Recognize and Respect Copyrighted Content?cited by 10
- 2025ShieldVLM: Safeguarding the Multimodal Implicit Toxicity via Deliberative Reasoning with LVLMscited by 7
- 2026Modular Safety Guardrails Are Necessary for Foundation-Model-Enabled Robots in the Real Worldcited by 7
- 2024LLM Safeguard is a Double-Edged Sword: Exploiting False Positives for Denial-of-Service Attackscited by 6
- 2026FraudShield: Knowledge Graph Empowered Defense for LLMs against Fraud Attackscited by 4
- 2026Compiling Activation Steering into Weights via Null-Space Constraints for Stealthy Backdoorscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Beyond Unsafe Detection: Counterfactually Anchored Evidence Attribution for Multi-Turn LLM Safety Failures
- 2024UniGuard: Towards Universal Safety Guardrails for Jailbreak Attacks on Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Seeing the Threat: Vulnerabilities in Vision-Language Models to Adversarial Attack
- 2026Scenes as an Attack Surface: Uncovering Scene-Grounded Safety Failures in MLLMs
- 2025ProGuard: Towards Proactive Multimodal Safeguard
- 2026Open Models, Open Risks: Measuring Unsafe Generation in Text-to-Image Models In the Wild
- 2026ADVERSA: Measuring Multi-Turn Guardrail Degradation and Judge Reliability in Large Language Models
- 2026Seeing No Evil: Blinding Large Vision-Language Models to Safety Instructions via Adversarial Attention Hijacking