Using Non-Lipschitz Signum-based Functions for Distributed Optimization and Machine Learning: Trade-off Between Con-vergence Rate and Optimality Gap
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, the prevalence of large-scale data-sets and the demand for sophisti-cated learning models have necessitated the development of efficient distributed ma-chine learning (ML) solutions. Convergence speed is a critical factor influencing the practicality and effectiveness of these distributed frameworks. Recently, non-Lipschitz continuous optimization algorithms have been proposed to improve the slow conver-gence rate of the existing linear solutions. The use of signum-based functions is previ-ously considered in consensus and control literature to reach fast convergence in the prescribed time and also to provide robust algorithms to noisy/outlier data. However, as shown in this work, these algorithms lead to an optimality gap and steady-state re-sidual of the objective function in discrete-time setup. This motivates us to investigate the distributed optimization and ML algorithms in terms of trade-off between conver-gence rate and optimality gap. In this direction, we specifically consider the distributed regression problem and check its convergence rate by applying both linear and non-Lipschitz signum-based functions. We check our distributed regression approach by extensive simulations. Our results show that although adopting signum-based func-tions may give faster convergence, it results in large optimality gaps. The findings pre-sented in this paper may contribute to and advance the ongoing discourse of similar distributed algorithms, e.g., for distributed constrained optimization and distributed estimation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.
Builds on
21 of 67 references.
References · 21
- 2013Distributed optimization over time-varying directed graphscited by 77
- 2014Learning Theory for Distribution Regressioncited by 48
- 2021A Hybrid Variance-Reduced Method for Decentralized Stochastic Non-Convex Optimizationcited by 21
- 2018Robust Asynchronous Stochastic Gradient-Push: Asymptotically Optimal and Network-Independent Performance for Strongly Convex Functionscited by 19
- 2020S-ADDOPT: Decentralized stochastic first-order optimization over directed graphscited by 12
- 2020An Analysis of Robustness of Non-Lipschitz Networkscited by 12
- 2021Distributed support-vector-machine over dynamic balanced directed networkscited by 8
- 2015Fast ADMM Algorithm for Distributed Optimization with Adaptive Penaltycited by 6
- 2020Single-Bit Consensus with Finite-Time Convergence: Theory and Applicationscited by 6
- 2020Fast-Convergent Dynamics for Distributed Allocation of Resources Over Switching Sparse Networks with Quantized Communication Linkscited by 6
- 2017Distributed Subgradient Projection Algorithm over Directed Graphs: Alternate Proofcited by 4
- 2024Accelerated Distributed Allocationcited by 4
9 more
- 2020Fast and Stable Nonconvex Constrained Distributed Optimization: The ELLADA Algorithmcited by 3
- 2021Breaking the Convergence Barrier: Optimization via Fixed-Time Convergent Flowscited by 3
- 2022Finite-Time Convergent Algorithms for Time-Varying Distributed Optimizationcited by 3
- 2019Cyber-Social Systems: Modeling, Inference, and Optimal Designcited by 2
- 2024How Clustering Affects the Convergence of Decentralized Optimization over Networks: A Monte-Carlo-based Approachcited by 2
- 2013Parallel and distributed optimization methods for estimation and control in networkscited by 1
- 2015Primal Recovery from Consensus-Based Dual Decomposition for Distributed Convex Optimizationcited by 1
- 2020Finite-Time Stability Under Denial of Servicecited by 1
- 2020Linear Convergence Rate Analysis of a Class of Exact First-Order Distributed Methods for Weight-Balanced Time-Varying Networks and Uncoordinated Step Sizescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.