An Analysis of Robustness of Non-Lipschitz Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite significant advances, deep networks remain highly susceptible to adversarial attack. One fundamental challenge is that small input perturbations can often produce large movements in the network's final-layer feature space. In this paper, we define an attack model that abstracts this challenge, to help understand its intrinsic properties. In our model, the adversary may move data an arbitrary distance in feature space but only in random low-dimensional subspaces. We prove such adversaries can be quite powerful: defeating any algorithm that must classify any input it is given. However, by allowing the algorithm to abstain on unusual inputs, we show such adversaries can be overcome when classes are reasonably well-separated in feature space. We further provide strong theoretical guarantees for setting algorithm parameters to optimize over accuracy-abstention trade-offs using data-driven methods. Our results provide new robustness guarantees for nearest-neighbor style algorithms, and also have application to contrastive learning, where we empirically demonstrate the ability of such algorithms to obtain high robust accuracy with low abstention rates. Our model is also motivated by strategic classification, where entities being classified aim to manipulate their observable features to produce a preferred classification, and we provide new insights into that area as well.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2024Algorithm Configuration for Structured Pfaffian Settingscited by 10
- 2022Accelerating ERM for data-driven algorithm design using output-sensitive techniquescited by 8
- 2025Offline-to-online hyperparameter transfer for stochastic banditscited by 6
- 2025PAC Learning with Improvementscited by 6
- 2023Efficiently Learning the Graph for Semi-supervised Learningcited by 5
- 2023Stratified Adversarial Robustness with Rejectioncited by 4
- 2024Learning accurate and interpretable tree-based modelscited by 3
- 2025Conservative classifiers do consistently well with improving agents: characterizing statistical and online learningcited by 2
- 2025Distribution-dependent Generalization Bounds for Tuning Linear Regression Across Taskscited by 2
- 2024Subsidy design for better social outcomescited by 1
- 2025Tuning Algorithmic and Architectural Hyperparameters in Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning with Provable Guaranteescited by 1
- 2026Using Non-Lipschitz Signum-based Functions for Distributed Optimization and Machine Learning: Trade-off Between Con-vergence Rate and Optimality Gapcited by 0
- 2026Using Non-Lipschitz Signum-based Functions for Distributed Optimization and Machine Learning: Trade-off Between Con-vergence Rate and Optimality Gap2 Aug 2026
- 2025Distribution-dependent Generalization Bounds for Tuning Linear Regression Across Tasks7 Jul 2025
- 2025Conservative classifiers do consistently well with improving agents: characterizing statistical and online learning5 Jun 2025
- 2025PAC Learning with Improvements5 Mar 2025
- 2025Tuning Algorithmic and Architectural Hyperparameters in Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Learning with Provable Guarantees18 Feb 2025
- 2025Offline-to-online hyperparameter transfer for stochastic bandits6 Jan 2025
- 2024Algorithm Configuration for Structured Pfaffian Settings6 Sep 2024
- 2024Subsidy design for better social outcomes4 Sep 2024
- 2024Learning accurate and interpretable tree-based models24 May 2024
- 2023Efficiently Learning the Graph for Semi-supervised Learning12 Jun 2023
- 2023Stratified Adversarial Robustness with Rejection2 May 2023
- 2022Accelerating ERM for data-driven algorithm design using output-sensitive techniques7 Apr 2022