mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Logit-Origin Centering for Singleton Test-Time Adaptation

arXiv 2608.01074 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tabular data is used extensively in many real-world use cases. Deep learning models have been developed to deal with tabular data, but generally perform poorly when the test data distribution differs from that of the training data. Researchers have proposed test-time adaptation approaches to deal with this problem. The fully test-time adaptation (FTTA) setting involves adapting deployed classifiers to shifted target distributions using only unlabeled test data. Leading FTTA methods inherit a batch-dependent approach from computer vision literature. This paper demonstrates for the first time that such approaches degrade sharply in strict streaming regimes where examples arrive and must be classified one at a time. This occurs because at a batch size of one, batch-level statistics become unavailable or poorly estimated. We argue that singleton tabular FTTA is not merely a small-batch variant of ordinary FTTA, but a distinct identifiability problem where only the location of the model's score stream remains directly observable. To address this, we propose Prequential Logit-Origin Centering (PLOC), a lightweight approach that keeps the source model frozen and shifts the logit space at each step. PLOC stores only a single running number (the mean of past logits), requires no labels, estimates no priors, and bypasses weight updates entirely. A deferred variant applies a static shift that preserves the source ranking, and thus the AUROC, exactly. Evaluated across five tabular benchmarks, three architectures (MLP, FT-Transformer, and TabTransformer), and five independent source checkpoints, PLOC significantly outperforms strong tabular and entropy-based baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 35 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  3. 2020Long-tail learning via logit adjustmentcited by 605
  4. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  5. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  6. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
  7. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
  8. 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 398
  9. 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 364
  10. 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 185
  11. 2022Parameter-free Online Test-time Adaptationcited by 184
  12. 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 150
5 more
  1. 2021The Norm Must Go On: Dynamic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Normalizationcited by 131
  2. 2019Regularized Learning for Domain Adaptation under Label Shiftscited by 118
  3. 2023Benchmarking Distribution Shift in Tabular Data with TableShiftcited by 64
  4. 2022Adaptive Online Incremental Learning for Evolving Data Streamscited by 11
  5. 2024Fully Test-time Adaptation for Tabular Datacited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.