mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DASH: Decoupled Adaptive Surrogate - Acquisition Harness for Automated Bayesian Optimization

arXiv 2608.00641 ↗First posted 1 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bayesian optimization (BO) relies on a surrogate model and an acquisition function, yet the most suitable choices vary across tasks and optimization stages. Automated Bayesian optimization (AutoBO) addresses this variability by adapting BO components online. However, existing AutoBO methods either adapt one component, leaving the other mismatched and creating a bottleneck, or jointly select surrogate--acquisition pairs under a shared criterion, overlooking their distinct roles: surrogate selection depends on predictive reliability, whereas acquisition adaptation should respond to campaign context.In this paper, we propose DASH, a Decoupled Adaptive Surrogate--Acquisition Harness for large-language- model (LLM)-enhanced AutoBO. DASH selects surrogates by predictive reliability, uncertainty calibration, and ranking consistency; its two-stage acquisition controller periodically reallocates quotas across acquisition functions, builds a BO shortlist accordingly, and delegates final selection to an LLM. DASH also incorporates an integrated harness, consisting of knowledge-guided warm start and structured memory, to ground optimization in domain knowledge and accumulated feedback. Across four chemical optimization tasks, DASH outperforms the best AutoBO baseline by 12.51% in trajectory-level Acceleration Factor and 5.00% in endpoint Enhancement Factor. Results remain strong across LLM backbones, and ablations verify the complementary contributions of all components. Full-table and behavioral contamination checks find no detectable evidence that direct benchmark memorization or source-cell leakage explains these gains.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2026.

Builds on

11 of 25 references.

References · 11

  1. 2024Large Language Models to Enhance Bayesian Optimizationcited by 135
  2. 2018Maximizing acquisition functions for Bayesian optimizationcited by 114
  3. 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPOcited by 112
  4. 2021Benchmarking the Performance of Bayesian Optimization across Multiple Experimental Materials Science Domainscited by 48
  5. 2016Parallel Bayesian Global Optimization of Expensive Functionscited by 44
  6. 2025Adaptive Kernel Design for Bayesian Optimization Is a Piece of CAKE with LLMscited by 17
  7. 2025Language-Based Bayesian Optimization Research Assistant (BORA)cited by 15
  8. 2025Large language models as uncertainty-calibrated optimizers for experimental discoverycited by 13
  9. 2025Reasoning BO: Enhancing Bayesian Optimization with Long-Context Reasoning Power of LLMscited by 8
  10. 2019No-PASt-BO: Normalized Portfolio Allocation Strategy for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 5
  11. 2020Towards Automatic Bayesian Optimization: A first step involving acquisition functionscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.